ToxSci Advance Access published online on December 7, 2007
Toxicological Sciences, doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfm297
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Published by Oxford University Press 2007.
Computational Toxicology – A State of the Science Mini Review¶





* National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency
National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency
National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency
To whom correspondence should be addressed at B-205-01, National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Received October 5, 2007; revision received December 4, 2007; accepted December 5, 2007
| Abstract |
|---|
Advances in computer sciences and hardware combined with equally significant developments in molecular biology and chemistry are providing toxicology with a powerful new tool box. This tool box of computational models promises to increase the efficiency and the effectiveness by which the hazards and risks of environmental chemicals are determined. Computational toxicology focuses on applying these tools across many scales, including vastly increasing the numbers of chemicals and the types of biological interactions that can be evaluated. In addition, knowledge of toxicity pathways gathered within the tool box will be directly applicable to the study of the biological responses across a range of dose levels, including those more likely to be representative of exposures to the human population. Progress in this field will facilitate the transformative shift called for in the recent report on toxicology in the 21st century by the National Research Council. This review surveys the state of the art in many areas of computational toxicology and points to several hurdles that will be important to overcome as the field moves forward. Proof-of-concept studies need to clearly demonstrate the additional predictive power gained from these tools. More researchers need to become comfortable working with both the data generating tools and the computational modeling capabilities, and regulatory authorities must show a willingness to the embrace new approaches as they gain scientific acceptance. The next few years should witness the early fruits of these efforts, but as the National Research Council indicates, the paradigm shift will take a long term investment and commitment to reach full potential.
¶ This mini-review is based on presentations and discussions at the International Science Forum on Computational Toxicology that was sponsored by the Office of Research and Development of the US Environmental Protection Agency and held in Research Triangle Park, NC on May 21-23, 2007. The complete agenda and copies of the individual presentations from the Forum are available on the Internet (www.epa.gov/ncct/sciforum).