Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on September 11, 2009
Toxicological Sciences 2009 112(2):482-489; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfp211
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
112/2/482    most recent
kfp211v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pohl, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kehe, K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pohl, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kehe, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Acute Morphological and Toxicological Effects in a Human Bronchial Coculture Model after Sulfur Mustard Exposure

Christine Pohl*,1,2, Mirko Papritz*,{dagger},2, Michaela Moisch*, Christoph Wübbeke{dagger}, M. Iris Hermanns*, Chiara Uboldi*, Jasmin Dei-Anang{ddagger}, Eckhard Mayer{ddagger}, Charles James Kirkpatrick* and Kai Kehe{dagger}

* Institute of Pathology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany {dagger} Bundeswehr Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology Munich, Munich, Germany {ddagger} Clinic for Thorax Surgery, Catholic Clinical Centre St. Hildegardis, Mainz, Germany

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +49 (0) 6131 17 5645. E-mail: pohlc{at}uni-mainz.de.

Received July 8, 2009; accepted September 1, 2009


   Abstract

Sulfur mustard (SM) is a strong alkylating agent. Inhalation of SM causes acute lung injury accompanied by severe disruption of the airway barrier. In our study, we tested the acute effects after mustard exposure in an in vitro coculture bronchial model of the proximal barrier. To achieve this, we seeded normal human bronchial epithelial explant-outgrowth cells (HBEC) together with lung fibroblasts as a bilayer on filter plates and exposed the bronchial model after 31 days of differentiation to various concentrations of SM (30, 100, 300, and 500µM). The HBEC formed confluent layers, expressing functional tight junctions as measured by transepithelial electrical resistance (TER). Mucus production and cilia formation reappeared in the coculture model. TER was measured after 2 and 24 h following treatment. Depending on the different concentrations, TER decreased in the first 2 h up to 55% of the control at the highest concentration. After 24 h, TER seemed to recover because at concentrations up to 300µM values were equal to the control. SM induced a widening of intercellular spaces and a loss in cell-matrix adhesion. Mucus production increased with the result that cilia ceased to beat. Changes in the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 were also observed. Apoptotic markers such as cytochrome c, p53, Fas-associated protein with death domain, and procaspase-3 were significantly induced at concentrations of less than 100µM. In summary, SM induces morphological and biochemical changes that reflect pathological effects of SM injury in vivo. It is hoped to use this coculture model to understand further the pathogenesis of SM-induced barrier injury and to search for novel approaches in SM therapy.

Key Words: primary bronchial cells; coculture; sulfur mustard; lung; barrier.


2 These authors contributed equally to this study.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.