Skip Navigation



ToxSci Advance Access published online on September 21, 2009

Toxicological Sciences, doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfp217
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hines, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Slikker, W.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hines, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Slikker, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Approaches for Assessing Risks to Sensitive Populations: Lessons Learned from Evaluating Risks in the Pediatric Population

Ronald N. Hines*, Dana Sargent{dagger}, Herman Autrup{ddagger}, Linda S. Birnbaum§, Robert L. Brent, Nancy G. Doerrer1,||, Elaine A. Cohen Hubaliii, Daland R. Jubergiiii, Christian Laurent#, Robert Luebkeiii, Klaus Olejniczak**, Christopher J. Portier§ and William Slikker{dagger}{dagger}

* Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA 53226-4801, rhines{at}mcw.edu {dagger} Bayer CropScience, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA 27709, dana.sargent{at}bayercropscience.com {ddagger} University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Åarhus C, Denmark, ha{at}mil.au.dk § NIH National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA 27709, birnbaumls{at}niehs.nih.gov, portier{at}niehs.nih.gov Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE, USA 19899, rbrent{at}nemours.org || ILSI Health and Environmental Sciences Institute, Washington, DC, USA 20005, ndoerrer{at}hesiglobal.org iii US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, hubal.elaine{at}epa.gov, luebke.robert{at}epamail.epa.gov iiii Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN, USA 46268, drjuberg{at}dow.com # (formerly with the European Food Safety Authority, I-43100 Parma, Italy), christianlaurent{at}alice.it ** Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, BfArM, D-53175 Bonn, Germany, k.olejniczak{at}bfarm.de {dagger}{dagger} US Food and Drug Administration National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, AR, USA 72079, william.slikker{at}fda.hhs.gov

1 Address correspondence to Nancy G. Doerrer, ILSI Health and Environmental Sciences Institute, 1156 Fifteenth St., NW, Second Floor, Washington, DC 20005. 202-659-3306 (phone), 202-659-3617 (fax); ndoerrer{at}hesiglobal.org (e-mail).

Received July 5, 2009; revision received September 4, 2009; accepted September 8, 2009


   Abstract

Assessing the risk profiles of potentially sensitive populations requires a ‘tool chest’ of methodological approaches to adequately characterize and evaluate these populations. At present, there is an extensive body of literature on methodologies that apply to the evaluation of the pediatric population. The HESI Subcommittee on Risk Assessment of Sensitive Populations evaluated key references in the area of pediatric risk to identify a spectrum of methodological approaches. These approaches are considered in this manuscript for their potential to be extrapolated for the identification and assessment of other sensitive populations. Recommendations as to future research needs and/or alternate methodological considerations also are made.

Key Words: sensitive populations; pharmacokinetics; pharmacodynamics; genetic variability; pediatric population; risk assessment; exposure assessment.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.