Skip Navigation



ToxSci Advance Access published online on October 29, 2009

Toxicological Sciences, doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfp264
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poet, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hinderliter, P. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poet, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hinderliter, P. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Quantitative Risk Analysis for N-Methyl Pyrrolidone using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic and Benchmark Dose Modeling

Torka S. Poet1, Chris R. Kirman2, Michael Bader3, Christoph van Thriel4, Michael L. Gargas5 and Paul M. Hinderliter1

1 Center for Biological Monitoring and Modeling, 902 Battelle Boulevard, P.O. Box 999, MSIN P7-59, Richland, WA 99352, USA 2 The Sapphire Group, Inc. 2000 Auburn Drive, Suite 200, Beachwood, OH 44122, USA 3 Hannover Medical School, Institute for Occupational Medicine, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany 4 Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystr. 67, 44139 Dortmund, Germany 5 The Sapphire Group, Inc. 2928 Idaho Falls Drive, Beavercreek, OH 45431, USA

Corresponding Author: Torka S. Poet, Ph.D. Battelle, Pacific Northwest Division, ph: 509-371-6984, fax: 509-376-9064, e-mail: torka.poet{at}pnl.gov

Received June 1, 2009; revision received October 8, 2009; accepted October 20, 2009


   Abstract

Establishing an occupational exposure limit (OEL) for N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP) is important due to its widespread use as a solvent. Based on studies in rodents, the most sensitive toxic endpoint is a decrease in fetal/pup bodyweights observed after oral, dermal, and inhalation exposures of dams to NMP. Evidence indicates the parent compound is the causative agent. To reduce the uncertainty in rat to human extrapolations, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models were developed to describe the pharmacokinetics of NMP in both species. Since in utero exposures are of concern, the models considered major physiological changes occurring in the dam or mother over the course of gestation. The rat PBPK model was used to determine the relationship between NMP concentrations in maternal blood and decrements in fetal/pup body weights following exposures to NMP vapor. Body weight decrements seen after vapor exposures occurred at lower NMP blood levels than those observed after oral and dermal exposures. Benchmark dose (BMD) modeling was used to better define a point of departure (POD) for fetal/pup body weight changes based on dose-response information from two inhalation studies in rats. The POD and human PBPK model were then used to estimate the human equivalent concentrations (HEC) that could be used to derive an OEL value for NMP. The geometric mean of the PODs derived from the rat studies was estimated to be 350 mg*hr/L (expressed in terms of internal dose), a value which corresponds to a HEC of 480 ppm (occupational exposure of 8 hours/day, 5 days/week). The HEC is much higher than recently-developed internationally-recognized OELs for NMP of 10 ppm to 20 ppm, suggesting that these OELs adequately protect workers exposed to NMP vapor.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.