Skip Navigation



ToxSci Advance Access published online on November 1, 2009

Toxicological Sciences, doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfp270
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hervé, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kennedy, S. W.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hervé, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kennedy, S. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Cytochrome P4501A induction by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and two chlorinated dibenzofurans in primary hepatocyte cultures of three avian species

Jessica C. Hervé*,{dagger}, Doug Crump{dagger}, Stephanie P. Jones{dagger}, Lukas J. Mundy{dagger}, John P. Giesy{ddagger},§, Matthew J. Zwiernik{ddagger}, Steven J. Bursian{ddagger}, Paul D. Jones§, Steve B. Wiseman§, Yi Wan§ and Sean W. Kennedy*,{dagger},1

* Centre for Advanced Research in Environmental Genomics, Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1N 6N5 {dagger} Environment Canada, National Wildlife Research Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0H3 {ddagger} Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA, 48824 § University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, S7N 5B3

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Sean W. Kennedy, Environment Canada, National Wildlife Research Centre, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Raven Road , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada , K1A 0H3 or K1S 5B6 (courier), sean.kennedy{at}ec.gc.ca, Tel: 613-998-7384; Fax: 613-998-0458

Received September 17, 2009; revision received October 21, 2009; accepted October 26, 2009


   Abstract

Relative potencies of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), 2,3,4,7,8-pentachlorodibenzofuran (PeCDF) and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran (TCDF) were determined in vitro in primary hepatocyte cultures of chicken (Gallus gallus), ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) and Japanese quail (Corturnix japonica) embryos. Concentration-dependent effects on ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase (EROD) activity, and expression of cytochrome P4501A4 and 1A5 (CYP1A4 and CYP1A5) mRNA were determined in hepatocytes exposed to serial dilutions of TCDD, PeCDF or TCDF for 24 h. In chicken hepatocytes, the three compounds were equipotent inducers of EROD activity and CYP1A4/5 mRNA expression. However, in ring-necked pheasant and Japanese quail hepatocytes, PeCDF was more potent than TCDD (3- to 5-fold in ring-necked pheasant; 13- to 30-fold in Japanese quail). Among species, the rank order of sensitivity (most to least) to EROD and CYP1A4/5 mRNA induction for TCDD and TCDF was: chicken > ring-necked pheasant > Japanese quail. In contrast, the three species were approximately equisensitive to EROD and CYP1A4/5 mRNA induction by PeCDF. It has generally been assumed that TCDD is the most potent ‘dioxin-like compound’ (DLC) and that the chicken is the most sensitive avian species to CYP1A induction by all DLCs. This study indicates that PeCDF is more potent than TCDD in ring-necked pheasant and Japanese quail hepatocytes, and that ring-necked pheasant, Japanese quail and chicken hepatocytes are equally sensitive to CYP1A induction by PeCDF.

Key Words: PCDD; PCDF; EROD; Bird; Hepatocytes; AHR.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.