Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on November 20, 2007
Toxicological Sciences 2008 102(1):33-41; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfm285
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/1/33    most recent
kfm285v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rasier, G.
Right arrow Articles by Bourguignon, J.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rasier, G.
Right arrow Articles by Bourguignon, J.-P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Mechanisms of Interaction of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals with Glutamate-Evoked Secretion of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone

Grégory Rasier*, Anne-Simone Parent*, Arlette Gérard*, Raphaël Denooz{dagger}, Marie-Christine Lebrethon*, Corinne Charlier{dagger} and Jean-Pierre Bourguignon*,1

* Developmental Neuroendocrinology Unit, Centre for Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology {dagger} Clinical, Forensic and Environmental Toxicology Laboratory, University of Liège, University Hospital, B-4000 Liège (Sart-Tilman), Belgium

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at Division of Paediatric Endocrinology and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital, B-4000 Liège (Sart-Tilman), Belgium. Fax: +32-4-366-72-46. E-mail: jpbourguignon{at}ulg.ac.be.

Received August 17, 2007; accepted October 15, 2007


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
In previous studies, we detected a dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) derivative in the serum of children with sexual precocity after migration from developing countries. Recently, we reported that DDT stimulated pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion and sexual maturation in the female rat. The aim of this study was to delineate the mechanisms of interaction of endocrine-disrupting chemicals including DDT with GnRH secretion evoked by glutamate in vitro. Using hypothalamic explants obtained from 15-day-old female rats, estradiol (E2) and DDT caused a concentration-related increase in glutamate-evoked GnRH release while p,p'-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethene and methoxychlor had no effect. The effective DDT concentrations in vitro were consistent with the serum concentrations measured in vivo 5 days after exposure of immature rats to 10 mg/kg/day of o,p'-DDT. Bisphenol A induced some stimulatory effect, whereas no change was observed with 4-nonylphenol. The o,p'-DDT effects in vitro were prevented partially by a selective antagonist of the {alpha}-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA) subtype of glutamate receptors. A complete prevention of o,p'-DDT effects was caused by an estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist as well as an aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) antagonist and inhibitors of protein kinases A and C and mitogen-activated kinases. While an intermittent incubation with E2 caused no change in amplification of the glutamate-evoked GnRH release for 4 h, continuous incubation with E2 or o,p'-DDT caused an increase of this amplification after 3.5 h of incubation. In summary, DDT amplifies the glutamate-evoked GnRH secretion in vitro through rapid and slow effects involving ER, AHR, and AMPA receptor mediation.

Key Words: gonadotropin-releasing hormone; endocrine-disrupting chemicals; glutamate receptors; estrogen receptors; aryl hydrocarbon receptor.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
The persisting secular shift in timing of puberty toward early onset in United States (Herman-Giddens et al., 1997Go; Lee et al., 2001Go) raised the issue of the possible role of environmental factors including endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) (Buck-Louis et al., in pressGo). In other countries such as Belgium and Denmark, a 20–80 times increased risk of sexual precocity in internationally adopted children (Krstevska-Konstantinova et al., 2001Go; Teilmann et al., 2006Go) also led to the question of possible EDC involvement (Parent et al., 2003Go). Based on the measurement of p,p'-dichlorodiphenylchloroethene (DDE) levels in the serum of those children, it was hypothesized that migration could account for early puberty after transient exposure to the estrogenic insecticide dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) in the home country (Krstevska-Konstantinova et al., 2001Go; Parent et al., 2003Go). That hypothesis was consistent with the early report of precocious puberty in female rats treated neonatally with o,p'-DDT by Heinrichs et al. (1971)Go who showed inhibitory effects on pituitary gonadotropin secretion and suggested a facilitatory hypothalamic mechanism (Gellert et al., 1972Go).

Very recently, we administered o,p'-DDT for 5 or 10 days in infantile female rats, and we found pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion in vitro to accelerate prematurely and precocious puberty to occur subsequently (Rasier et al., 2007Go). In that study, the effects on GnRH secretion became significant after several hours, and both the estrogen receptors (ERs) and the orphan dioxin receptor (aryl hydrocarbon receptor [AHR]) appeared to be involved in DDT effects on pulsatile GnRH secretion. In previous studies from our laboratory, estradiol (E2) was shown to cause a rapid (within 7.5–15 min) amplification of the GnRH release evoked by glutamate, a main excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain. This effect involved the {alpha}-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA)-kainate receptor subtypes, the {alpha}-subunit of ERs, and different intracellular kinases (Matagne et al., 2005Go). Beside those rapid effects, initially inactive concentrations of E2 (Matagne et al., 2005Go) and DDT (Rasier et al., 2007Go) were shown to have effects appearing with time, indicating slow and possibly genomic effects. This was the reason why the glutamate-evoked secretion of GnRH was studied over several hours in the present study.

Our aims were as follows: (1) to study whether DDT and derivatives could have rapid effects similar to E2 on the glutamate-evoked release of GnRH in vitro; (2) to compare DDT effects with those of other EDCs such as methoxychlor (MXC) and bisphenol A (BPA). MXC is another pesticide that has been developed to replace DDT and to have a similar spectrum of intended effects while being more readily eliminated from the body and less persisting in nature. MXC estrogenic activity is presumably related to the ability of its metabolite hydroxyphenyltrichloroethane to bind to intracellular ERs (Miller et al., 2006Go). BPA is a common EDC used in the manufacture of a variety of products including reusable milk and food storage containers, baby formula bottles, interior lacquer coating of food cans, or dental sealants. This compound has been found to compete with E2 for binding to ERs though its affinity for those receptors is much less than that of E2 (Kwon et al., 2000Go). (3) To study whether DDT and derivatives could have effects on the glutamate-evoked release of GnRH over a period of several hours and the receptor mechanisms involved in such effects.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
Animals
Fifteen-day-old female Wistar rats were purchased from the University of Liège. They were housed in standardized conditions with lactating dams (22°C, lights on from 06:30 to 18:30 h, food and water ad libitum) till the time of sacrifice. Each litter contained 5–10 pups. The day of birth was considered as postnatal day (PND) 1. All experiments were carried out with the approval of the Belgian Ministry of Agriculture and the Ethical Committee at the University of Liège.

Incubation of Hypothalamic Explants
After decapitation, the hypothalamus was rapidly dissected. The limits to obtain the retrochiasmatic hypothalamus were the caudal margin of the optic chiasm, the caudal margin of the mammillary bodies, and the lateral hypothalamic sulci. Each explant was transferred into an individual incubation chamber, as described in detail previously (Bourguignon et al., 1989aGo; Matagne et al., 2004Go), which contained 500 µl of phenol red–free minimum essential medium (MEM) supplemented with glucose, magnesium, glycine, and bacitracin to achieve final concentrations of 25 x 10–3, 10–3, 10–8, and 2 x 10–5M, respectively. The explants were incubated in an atmosphere of 95% O2–5% CO2. The incubation medium was collected and renewed every 7.5 min and kept frozen until assayed. Since some "traumatic" peptide release was observed for the first 7.5–15 min of incubation, the explants were incubated for 30 min before the first glutamate stimulation.

Assays
The GnRH release in the incubation medium was measured in duplicate using a radioimmunoassay method with intra- and interassay coefficients of variation of 14 and 18%, respectively (Bourguignon et al., 1989aGo,bGo). The highly specific CR11-B81 anti-GnRH antiserum (final dilution 1:80,000) was kindly provided by Dr V. D. Ramirez (Urbana, IL) (Dluzen and Ramirez, 1981Go). The data below the limit of detection (5 pg/7.5-min fraction) were assigned that value.

The identification and quantification of p,p'-DDT, o,p'-DDT, p,p'-DDE, and o,p'-DDE in serum were performed using a gas chromatographic analyzer coupled to an ion-trap mass spectrometer (MS) detector (PolarisQ, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). Sample preparation included a liquid-liquid extraction (petroleum ether:diethylether, 98:2) followed by a solid-phase extraction (Bond Elut Certify, Varian, Harbor City, CA). The eluate was evaporated to dryness, reconstituted with n-hexane, and then injected into the gas chromatograph. The column was a HP-5 Trace (30 m x 0.25 mm internal diameter) from Agilent (Waldbronn, Germany). For detection, the MS was operated in the electronic impact mode (70 eV). Multiple reaction monitoring was used for identification and quantification. All solvents were of the highest purity available and pesticide-grade quality (Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ). Reference standards of all pesticides were obtained from Dr Ehrenstorfer (Augsburg, Germany). Aldrine was used as internal standard. The calibration curve was constructed from 0.5 to 20 ppb, and samples dilutions were applied to this concentration range. The limits of quantification were defined as 10 times the SD of the results of a blank sample. These limits were 0.5 ppb for p,p'-DDT, o,p'-DDT, p,p'-DDE, and o,p'-DDE, and the coefficients of variation were 7.7, 7.1, 8.2, and 6.1%, respectively. Based on the amount of serum used, the limit of detection was 1 ng/ml serum (Charlier and Plomteux, 2002Go).

Reagents
The phenol red–free MEM (supplemented with Earle's and L-glutamine) was purchased from Life Technologies Invitrogen Corporation (Merelbeke, Belgium). E2 (17β-estradiol or 3,17β-dihydroxy-1,3,5(10)-estratriene), the two DDT isomers, o,p'-DDT (2,4'-DDT) and p,p'-DDT (4,4'-DDT), p,p'-DDE (4,4'-DDE), MXC (1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis-(4-methoxyphenyl)ethane), BPA (2,2-bis-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-propane), 4-nonylphenol (4-NP), bacitracin, the AHR antagonist {alpha}-naphthoflavone (7,8-benzoflavone), the protein kinase (PK) A and C inhibitor staurosporine, and the PKC inhibitor chelerythrine chloride (1,2-dimethoxy-N-methyl(1,3)benzodioxolo(5,6-c)phenanthridinium chloride) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Bornem, Belgium). The AMPA/kainate subtype of glutamate receptor antagonist DNQX (6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione), the AMPA receptor selective antagonist SYM 2206 (4-aminophenyl-1,2-dihydro-1-methyl-2-propylcarbamoyl-6,7-methylenedioxyphtalazine) and the ER antagonist ICI 182,780 (7{alpha},17β-[9[(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentyl)sulfinyl]nonyl]-1,3,5(10)-estratriene-3,17β-diol) were purchased from Tocris Fisher Bioblock Scientific (Illkirch, France). The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2) inhibitor PD98059 (2'-amino-3'-methoxyflavone) was purchased from Calbiochem (VWR International, Leuven, Belgium). In all experiments, steroid or EDCs were dissolved initially in absolute ethanol (Labonord, Templenars, Belgium) and subsequently in the incubation medium to achieve a final ethanol concentration of 0.01%. All the other drugs were directly diluted in the incubation medium.

Experimental Protocols
In vivo experiments.
Female rats received a daily sc administration of o,p'-DDT (10 mg/kg/day) or vehicle (sesame oil) for 5 days (PND 6–10). The insecticide was first dissolved in absolute ethanol and then diluted in 50 µl of sesame oil for sc injection with 24 rats studied in the treated group in comparison with 24 controls. On PND 15 and 22, on the day of vaginal opening (VO) and on the day of first estrus, six rats from each group were sacrificed to study the serum levels of the DDT isomers. A daily examination for imperforation of the vaginal membrane was achieved to determine age at VO. Thereafter, vaginal smears were taken every day in the afternoon until first estrus. Slides of vaginal smears were colored using the Papanicolaou method to detect the occurrence of estrous cyclicity (Papanicolaou and Traut, 1941Go). The age at first estrus was considered when vaginal smears contained primary cornified cells after the first proestrous phase which is characterized by both stratified and cornified cells (Ojeda and Urbanski, 1994Go). The in vivo conditions for these experiments were similar to a previous study (Rasier et al., 2007Go).

In vitro experiments.
The effects of E2 or EDCs were studied on the glutamate-evoked GnRH release from hypothalamic explants obtained in 15-day-old female rats. Glutamate was incubated with the explant for a 7.5-min fraction, at a submaximal concentration (10–2M) which was shown previously to be required to evoke GnRH secretion in vitro (Matagne et al., 2005Go). Such a glutamate challenge was repeated every 37.5 min for a period of 4–5 h. The 10–2M concentration of glutamate was presumably not resulting in any toxic effect since a similar GnRH secretory response could be obtained throughout a 4-h experiment (Bourguignon et al., 1989bGo; Matagne et al., 2005Go). Each experiment on the effects of E2 or EDCs started and finished with a control glutamate stimulation in the absence of any other compound. The glutamate-evoked release of GnRH was compared in control conditions and during coincubation with E2 or EDCs added in the incubation medium. These substances were used at increasing concentrations (E2: 10–10 to 10–6M; p,p'-DDT and o,p'-DDT: 10–8 to 10–4M; p,p'-DDE, MXC, BPA, and 4-NP: 10–9 to 10–4M) for two 7.5-min fractions, before and during incubation with glutamate. In some experiments, the effects of E2 or EDCs were studied in the presence of antagonists or inhibitors that were used for three consecutive 7.5-min fractions so that they were firstly incubated alone, secondly with the steroid or EDCs, and thirdly with the two substances and glutamate. DNQX and SYM 2206 (10–6M) were used to study the involvement of the AMPA/kainate subtype of glutamate receptors on the amplification of the glutamate-evoked GnRH release caused by E2 (10–7M) or o,p'-DDT (10–4M). The implication of ERs was studied using the antagonist ICI 182,780 (10–7M). To investigate the implication of AHR, the antagonist {alpha}-naphthoflavone (10–7M) was used. The concentration of these four antagonists was selected based on previous data from this laboratory and another study (Ojeda and Urbanski, 1994Go; Rasier et al., 2007Go). To investigate intracellular pathways and kinase involvement in E2 or o,p'-DDT effects, the PKA and C inhibitor staurosporine (10–7M), the PKC inhibitor chelerythrine chloride (10–5M), and the MAPK inhibitor PD98059 (5 x 10–5M) were used.

Statistical Analysis
A minimum of four explants were used for each condition in an experiment. The secretory response (pg/7.5-min fraction) was calculated as the difference between the levels in the fractions collected immediately prior to and during exposure to the glutamate. Raw data were pooled and analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance test followed by a Newman-Keuls posttest when the threshold for significance of difference (p < 0.05) was reached (GraphPad Prism software for PC). In order to compare the results obtained among experiments in which the control data were different due to the use of receptor antagonists in some experiments, the absolute levels (determined by radioimmunoassay as pg/7.5-min fraction) were transformed as percentages of the glutamate-evoked release observed in control conditions and regarded as 100%. The statistical analysis was performed using the absolute as well as transformed data, and identical significance levels were obtained in both conditions. The time-related changes in serum concentrations of o,p'-DDT were compared after log transformation of the data because they were lognormally distributed. Geometric means were calculated, and data were represented on a log scale. All other results are expressed as mean ± SD.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
Serum Levels of DDT Isomers and Derivatives After In Vivo Treatment
We showed earlier that an early exposure to o,p'-DDT between PND 5 and 10 accelerated pulsatile GnRH secretion and induced a precocious puberty in female rats (Rasier et al., 2007Go). In order to determine if the concentrations of o,p'-DDT achieved in vivo were consistent with the concentrations used in vitro in the present study, we measured DDT isomers and metabolites serum concentrations after in vivo administration of o,p'-DDT. Five days after a 5-day treatment with o,p'-DDT, the mean serum level of this isomer was 361 ng/ml. Seven days later, the level dropped to 23 ng/ml. VO and first estrus occurred early on PND 23 and 27, respectively, confirming our previous findings (Rasier et al., 2007Go). The mean serum o,p'-DDT level was 22 ng/ml at VO and 4 ng/ml at first estrus (Fig. 1). The p,p'-DDT isomer and the p,p'-DDE and o,p'-DDE derivatives were undetectable in the serum of the treated rats at any time of the study, and none of the studied compounds were detectable in the serum of control rats.


Figure 1
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 1. Geometric mean (± SD) serum levels of o,p'-DDT at four time points after administration of o,p'-DDT for 5 days (PND 6–10): PND 15, PND 22, on the day of VO, and on the day of first estrus. The average serum concentration on PND 15 is equivalent to 10–6M (n = 6).

 
Concentration-Response Effects of E2 or EDCs on Glutamate-Evoked GnRH Release
In Figure 2 are illustrated three representative concentration-response profiles of the glutamate-evoked GnRH release from retrochiasmatic hypothalamic explants obtained at 15 days in female rats. Repeated challenges with glutamate alone for 7.5 min every 37.5 min resulted in a reproducible release of GnRH which was maintained for 4 h (Fig. 2A). Coincubation with increasing concentrations of E2 caused a concentration-related increase in glutamate-evoked GnRH release (Fig. 2B). As shown in Figure 3A, this effect became significant using 10–8M of E2 (128.0 ± 4.9% of control) and further increased to 162.6 ± 15.1% and 195.0 ± 6.4% using 10–7M and 10–6M of E2, respectively. A concentration-response increase in glutamate-evoked GnRH release was also caused by o,p'-DDT (Figs. 2C and 3B), 10–5 and 10–4M being required for a significant effect (130.8 ± 4.5% and 173.7 ± 7.6%, respectively). After repeated glutamate stimulation in the presence of increasing concentrations of E2 or o,p'-DDT, a final stimulatory challenge with glutamate alone could evoke a release similar to that obtained initially (Figs. 2B and C). The p,p'-DDT isomer was as effective as o,p'-DDT since the 10–5 and 10–4M concentrations accounted for a significant increase in GnRH release (135.7 ± 8.8% and 185.3 ± 18.1%, respectively). In contrast, p,p'-DDE, a stable DDT derivative, and MXC, a DDT-related EDC, had no effect (Fig. 3B). BPA was significantly stimulatory when used at 10–4M (201.7 ± 74.2%), whereas the 10–5M concentration did not result in any effect (94.2 ± 22.0%). When used at similar concentrations, 4-NP did not show any effect (Fig. 3C).


Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 2. Representative profiles of glutamate-evoked GnRH secretion from hypothalamic explants obtained at 15 days in female rats and incubated in MEM for 4 h. Glutamate was added repeatedly (every 37.5 min) for 7.5 min alone (A) and together with increasing concentrations of E2 (B) or o,p'-DDT (C) which were also incubated for an additional 7.5 min before glutamate stimulation. The limit of detection was 5 pg/7.5 min.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 3. Concentration-response effect of E2 (A) and several EDCs (B and C) on glutamate-evoked secretory response of GnRH using hypothalamic explants from 15-day-old female rats. The GnRH secretory response (mean ± SD) was calculated as the difference between the levels in the fraction collected immediately prior to and during exposure to the glutamate (pg/7.5-min fraction). Those differences were then converted in percentage of controls (glutamate alone). *p < 0.05 versus control.

 
Receptors and Signaling Involved in E2 or EDC Effects on Glutamate-Evoked GnRH Release
When DNQX, an antagonist of the AMPA/kainate subtypes of glutamate receptors, was used, the glutamate-evoked release of GnRH was markedly reduced versus control (5.8 ± 0.4% vs. 11.2 ± 1.3 pg/7.5 min). This was presumably due to suppression of the kainate receptor contribution to the glutamate-evoked release since the selective AMPA antagonist SYM 2206 did not significantly reduce the glutamate-evoked release of GnRH (10.8 ± 0.8 vs. 11.4 ± 1.1 pg/7.5 min). To allow comparison of the amplification by 10–7M of E2 or 10–4M of o,p'-DDT of the glutamate-evoked GnRH secretion, the data were calculated as percentages of the secretory response obtained in the presence of the antagonist alone. In the presence of DNQX, both E2 and o,p'-DDT could still significantly increase the glutamate-evoked secretion of GnRH though the amplification of the response by E2 was less than that in control conditions. In the presence of the specific AMPA antagonist SYM 2206, both the E2 and o,p'-DDT amplification of the glutamate-evoked GnRH release were significant but less marked than in control conditions, indicating a contribution of AMPA receptors (Fig. 4A). When the ER antagonist ICI 182,780 was used (Fig. 4B), the E2 and o,p'-DDT amplification of the glutamate-evoked GnRH secretion were completely prevented. When the AHR antagonist {alpha}-naphthoflavone was used, only the increase in GnRH secretory response caused by o,p'-DDT was prevented, whereas the E2 potentiating effect was unchanged (Fig. 4B). Inhibitors of PKA and C (staurosporine and chelerythrine chloride) as well as MAPK (PD98059) all prevented completely the amplification by E2 and o,p'-DDT of the glutamate-evoked GnRH release (Table 1).


Figure 4
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 4. Effects of antagonists of AMPA/kainate (DNQX) and AMPA (SYM 2206) subtypes of glutamate receptors (A), ERs (ICI 182,780), and AHR ({alpha}-naphthoflavone) (B) on the increase in glutamate-evoked GnRH secretion caused by E2 or o,p'-DDT. The GnRH secretory response (mean ± SD) was calculated as the difference between the levels in the fraction collected immediately prior to and during exposure to the glutamate (pg/7.5-min fraction). Those differences were then converted in percentage of control (glutamate alone or glutamate with antagonist). Hypothalamic explants from 15-day-old female rats were used. p < 0.05 versus glutamate alone (a), versus glutamate + antagonist (b), versus glutamate + E2 (c), versus glutamate + o,p'-DDT (d).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Effect of Kinase Inhibitors on the Glutamate-Evoked GnRH Release (% of Controls)

 
When 10–8M of E2 was applied intermittently for 15-min episodes that were repeated every 37.5 min, the GnRH release evoked by glutamate showed a similar increase during a 4-h study period (Fig. 5). After stopping exposure to E2 at the end of the experiment, the explants recovered a response similar to that obtained initially. When E2 was applied continuously, the glutamate-evoked GnRH release showed a significant increase similar to that observed when E2 was used intermittently. After 3.5 h of incubation, however, a further increase in glutamate-evoked GnRH secretion (148.2 ± 2.1%) was caused by E2 and some significant increase persisted at the end of the experiment (114.9 ± 1.4%), after stopping incubation with E2. A similar time-dependent effect was observed using 10–5M of o,p'-DDT, except that the increase in glutamate-evoked secretion was less marked and did not persist after being back to control conditions at the end of the experiment.


Figure 5
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 5. Secretory response of GnRH to 10–2M of glutamate used for 7.5 min every 37.5 min for 5 h. Starting after 60 min and ending after 262.5 min, the explants are incubated intermittently (for 15 min, every 37.5 min) or continuously with E2 or o,p'-DDT. a: p < 0.05 versus initial glutamate secretory response; b: p < 0.05 versus previous E2-potentiated or o,p'-DDT–potentiated glutamate secretory response.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
In the present study, we provide evidence that several EDCs can directly stimulate the GnRH secretion evoked by glutamate. Such effects occur rapidly, within 15 min and further increase after several hours of exposure. Emphasis was put on o,p'-DDT since we showed recently that early exposure to this chemical resulted in acceleration of pulsatile GnRH secretion and sexual precocity (Rasier et al., 2007Go). The concentrations used in vitro for our study were shown to be consistent with serum levels achieved after in vivo administration. We found that the mechanism of o,p'-DDT effects involves several receptors (ERs, AHR, and AMPA) and intracellular kinases (A, C, and MAPK).

When compared with other in vitro paradigms involving GnRH neurons, the static incubation of hypothalamic explants maintains GnRH neurons in their original surrounding neurono-glial environment and such explants retain the capacity of pulsatile secretion of GnRH (Matagne et al., 2004Go; Rasier et al., 2007Go). Though these two characteristics may account for some functional relevance of our observations in vitro, the required concentrations of some reagents such as glutamate are higher than using cell cultures (Donoso et al., 1990Go; Kuehl-Kovarik et al., 2002Go; Matagne et al., 2005Go; Ojeda and Urbanski, 1994Go; Rubin et al., 2006Go). This discrepancy which is still unexplained (reagent diffusion, degradation, ...) raises the issue of possible irrelevance of the in vitro data as well as concerns regarding possible excitotoxic effects mediated via the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor subtype. However, the capacity of the explants to respond to repeated glutamate stimulation is sustained for several hours, suggesting the functional integrity of the neurono-glial apparatus involved in the secretory process. The concentrations of E2 and o,p'-DDT used in vitro for the mechanistic studies are consistent with those used by others (Clark et al., 1998Go; Diel et al., 2002Go; Urbanski et al., 1996Go). They have been selected after a concentration-response study on amplification of the glutamate-evoked secretion of GnRH. For each EDC, the maximal effective concentration has not been determined but a concentration-response effect can be observed. Similar to E2, the two DDT isomers increased rapidly the GnRH secretion evoked by glutamate in a concentration-dependent manner. The E2:EDC ratios of biocapacity observed with DDT isomers and BPA were consistent with other in vitro studies (Clark et al., 1998Go; Desaulniers et al., 2005Go; Rasier et al., 2006Go). The other tested EDCs did not show any effect at the studied concentrations. The lack of effect of DDE can be explained by its prominent anti-androgenic nature. In fact, DDE is considered to be much less estrogenic than DDT. The absence of effect of MXC could be explained by a recent study showing that its estrogenic effects might be mediated by its metabolites, mono-OH MXC and bis-OH MXC (1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethane), after cytochrome P450 metabolization (Miller et al., 2006Go). It is important that the serum o,p'-DDT concentrations measured 5 days after a treatment in vivo with the EDC are consistent with the effective concentrations in vitro. Using a 10 times higher dose of p,p'-DDT in vivo given orally for 7 days, others found a plateau plasma concentration of 7.20 µg/l, that is about 20 times higher than the level we have observed 5 days after termination of treatment in our conditions (Mussi et al., 2005Go). No DDT derivatives, in particular o,p'-DDE, could be detected in our conditions after o,p'-DDT treatment, suggesting that, in the rat, few transformation of DDT into DDE had occurred. Tomiyama et al. (2003)Go, however, found plasma DDE to attain concentrations 10 times lower to those of DDT as soon as 2 days after starting exposure to DDT. Some explanation for this discrepancy could relate to differences in degradation rate depending on the nature of DDT isomer, the treatment dose, and the age at administration since they administered p,p'-DDT between PND 36 and 42 while we gave 10 times less of o,p'-DDT on PND 6–10.

In previous studies from our laboratory, the effects of E2 on pulsatile GnRH secretion occurring within hours (Matagne et al., 2004Go) were found to parallel the effects on glutamate-evoked GnRH release occurring within minutes (Matagne et al., 2005Go). Therefore, after showing that o,p'-DDT stimulated frequency of pulsatile GnRH secretion (Rasier et al., 2007Go), we followed a similar approach toward a mechanistic study based on glutamate-evoked secretion. Along the same line, 15-day-old female rats were used since GnRH secretion in vitro was maximally affected by E2 at that age (Matagne et al., 2004Go, 2005Go). While BPA was found to be also capable of stimulating the glutamate-evoked GnRH secretion, we put emphasis on DDT because of the possible involvement of the insecticide in sexual precocity of migrating children (Krstevska-Konstantinova et al., 2001Go; Parent et al., 2003Go) and the experimental evidence of hypothalamic-pituitary effects in the rat (Gellert et al., 1972Go; Heinrichs et al., 1971Go). Overall, the effects of DDT appear to be comparable to those of E2, and ERs play a key role in mediating such effects. The two main mechanisms involved in endocrine disruption are agonistic effects at ERs or estrogenic as shown for DDT, and antagonistic effects at androgen receptors or anti-androgenic as shown for DDE (Clark et al., 1998Go; Kelce et al., 1995Go). In our experimental conditions, it was shown previously that both estrogens and androgens were capable of potentiating the GnRH secretion, the effects of androgens being aromatase dependent and ultimately mediated through estrogens (Matagne et al., 2004Go). Thus, the effects reported here fall within the estrogenic category.

The AMPA receptors are an additional class of receptors involved in DDT effects. The prominent role of NMDA and kainate receptors in glutamate-mediated pulsatile GnRH secretion and the involvement of both NMDA and kainate receptors in the glutamate-evoked release of GnRH have been demonstrated in earlier studies (Bourguignon et al., 1989bGo; Matagne et al., 2004Go, 2005Go; Parent et al., 2005Go). By contrast, a selective AMPA antagonist does not affect, neither pulsatile GnRH secretion (Rasier et al., 2007Go) nor the glutamate-evoked release as shown here, indicating no involvement of the AMPA receptor subtype in such conditions. These receptors, however, appear to play some role in the effects of E2 and o,p'-DDT on both the pulsatile secretion of GnRH (Rasier et al., 2007Go) and its release evoked by glutamate. Since those two effects occur, respectively, after 1–2 h and 7.5–15 min, the former were thought to possibly involve genomic mechanisms and the latter nongenomic. In consistency with a time-dependent involvement of two mechanisms, E2 and o,p'-DDT cause rapidly an increase in glutamate-evoked GnRH release and a further increase occurring after few hours as a slow effect. Not only time but also continuity of the exposure to the steroid is critical since the slow component of the increased responsiveness to glutamate does not appear when exposure is discontinuous. In contrast, we had no evidence of priming of the response caused by the repeated glutamate stimulation. Herbison (1998)Go, and Herbison and Pape (2001)Go have reported that E2 exerts complex effects on GnRH neuronal function including long-term or genomic effects through binding to ER{alpha}- and/or β-subtypes. Furthermore, in vitro rapid nongenomic effects of E2 can occur within seconds to minutes in various conditions to influence cellular events such as kainate-induced currents in hippocampal neurons (Improta-Brears et al., 1999Go) and second messenger cascades in hippocampal (Gu et al., 1999Go) or hypothalamic neurons (Abraham et al., 2004Go; Lagrange et al., 1999Go). Regarding a possible genomic effect, E2 has been shown to stimulate AMPA glutamate receptor expression in the rat hypothalamus (Diano et al., 1997Go). This could be one of the mechanisms explaining AMPA involvement in E2 or EDC effects on GnRH secretion. As far as we know, this is the first report showing the involvement of the AMPA subtype of glutamate receptors in rapid EDC effects. A few recent studies showed that AMPA receptors mediate plastic effects induced by E2 in different populations of neurons (Todd et al., 2007Go; Tsurugizawa et al., 2005Go). Particularly, AMPA receptors have been shown to be involved in the neuronal morphological changes induced by E2 in the ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus in female rats, specifically (Todd et al., 2007Go). Both E2 and o,p'-DDT potentiating effects on the glutamate-evoked GnRH release could be prevented by PKA and C and MAPK inhibitors. These observations confirm our earlier report for E2 and provide further evidence of a rapid intracellular component of EDC effects.

Our data also indicate the possible role of AHR in mediating o,p'-DDT effects on GnRH secretion. As reviewed recently, the AHR is an ubiquitous receptor system binding endogenous ligand as well as xenobiotics such as dioxins (Harper et al., 2006Go). In this study, it appears that o,p'-DDT could be a ligand of AHR since its effects on GnRH release are antagonized by {alpha}-naphthoflavone. Only the glutamate-evoked GnRH secretion amplified by o,p'-DDT is prevented by {alpha}-naphthoflavone, suggesting that DDT can stimulate GnRH secretion through a mechanism partially different from that of E2. Beyond the presumably initial step in o,p'-DDT effects, the pathway seems to be similar to E2 with involvement of the AMPA receptors in rapid effects and also ERs in rapid and slow effects (Rasier et al., 2007Go). To integrate these observations, it is conceivable that the o,p'-DDT–AHR complex results in a cross talk with the E2 signaling machinery and forms a functional transcriptional complex in the regulatory region of ER{alpha}-responsive genes (Ohtake et al., 2003Go).

Recently, kisspeptin (kiss-1), a tumor suppressing peptide, and its receptor GPR54 have been identified as major actors of the regulation of GnRH secretion (de Roux et al., 2003Go; Seminara and Kaiser, 2005Go). Kiss-1 and GPR54 are expressed in the medial basal hypothalamus, and kiss-1 has a direct action on GnRH neurons which express GPR54. Recent studies have shown that kisspeptin neurons in the anteroventral periventricular nucleus express {alpha}-subtype of ERs and that E2 might exert a positive feedback on GnRH secretion during LH surge by stimulating kiss-1 expression (Adachi et al., 2007Go). Knowing that crucial role of kiss-1 in regulation of GnRH secretion and its modulation by E2, we could hypothesize that kiss-1 could be a potential target for estrogenic EDCs.

In summary, this study shows that EDCs, in particular o,p'-DDT, can modulate the GnRH secretion in vitro in the immature female hypothalamus through both rapid and slow effects with the involvement of estrogen, dioxin, and AMPA receptor pathways.


    FUNDING
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
European Commission (EDEN project, QLRT-2001-00269); Faculty of Medicine at the University of Liège (Léon Frédéricq Foundation); Belgian Study Group for Paediatric Endocrinology.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
Abraham IM, Todman MG, Korach KS, Herbison AE. Critical in vivo roles for classical estrogen receptors in rapid estrogen actions on intracellular signalling in mouse brain. Endocrinology (2004) 145:3055–3061.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Adachi S, Yamada S, Takatsu Y, Matsui H, Kinoshita M, Takase K, Sugiura H, Ohtaki T, Matsumoto H, Uenoyama Y, et al. Involvement of anteroventral periventricular metastin/kisspeptin neurons in estrogen positive feedback action on luteinizing hormone release in female rats. J. Reprod. Dev. (2007) 53:367–378.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Bourguignon JP, Gérard A, Franchimont P. Direct activation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion through different receptors to neuroexcitatory amino acids. Neuroendocrinology (1989a) 49:402–408.[Web of Science][Medline]

Bourguignon JP, Gérard A, Mathieu J, Simons J, Franchimont P. Pulsatile release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone from hypothalamic explants is restrained by blockade of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Endocrinology (1989b) 125:1090–1096.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Buck-Louis GM, Gray LE Jr, Michele Marcus M, Ojeda S, Pescovitz OA, Feldman Witchel S, Sippell W, Abbott DA, Soto A, Tyl RW, et al. Environmental factors and puberty timing: Expert panel research needs. Pediatrics (2008) (in press).

Charlier C, Plomteux G. Determination of organochlorine pesticides residues in the blood of healthy individuals. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. (2002) 40:361–364.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Clark EJ, Norris DO, Jones RE. Interactions of gonadal steroids and pesticides (DDT and DDE) on gonadal duct in larval tiger salamanders Ambystoma tigrinum. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. (1998) 109:94–105.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

de Roux N, Genin E, Carel JC, Matsuda F, Chaussain JL, Milgrom E. Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism due to loss of function of the kiss-1-derived peptide receptor GPR54. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (2003) 100:10972–10976.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Desaulniers D, Cooke GM, Leingartner K, Soumano K, Cole J, Yang J, Wade M, Yagminas A. Effects of postnatal exposure to a mixture of polychlorinated biphenyls, p,p'-dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, and p,p'-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethene in prepubertal and adult female Sprague-Dawley rats. Int. J. Toxicol. (2005) 24:111–127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Diano S, Naftolin F, Horvath TL. Gonadal steroids target AMPA glutamate receptor-containing neurons in the rat hypothalamus, septum and amygdala: A morphological and biochemical study. Endocrinology (1997) 138:778–789.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Diel P, Olff S, Schmidt S, Michna H. Effects of the environmental estrogens bisphenol A, o,p'-DDT, p-tert-octylphenol, and coumestrol on apoptosis induction, cell proliferation, and the expression of estrogen sensitive molecular parameters in the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2002) 80:61–70.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Dluzen DE, Ramirez VD. Presence and localization of immunoreactive luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone within the olfactory bulbs of adult male and female rats. Peptides (1981) 2:493–496.[Web of Science][Medline]

Donoso AO, Lopez FJ, Negro-Vilar A. Glutamate-receptors of the non-N-methyl-D-aspartic acid type mediate the increase in luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone release by excitatory amino acids in vitro. Endocrinology (1990) 126:414–420.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gellert RJ, Heinrichs WL, Swerdloff RS. DDT homologues: Estrogen-like effects on the vagina, uterus, and pituitary of the rat. Endocrinology (1972) 91:1095–1100.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gu Q, Korach KS, Moss RL. Rapid action of 17β-estradiol on kainate-induced currents in hippocampal neurons lacking intracellular estrogen receptors. Endocrinology (1999) 140:660–666.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Harper PA, Riddick DS, Okey AB. Regulating the regulator: Factors that control levels and activity of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Biochem. Pharmacol. (2006) 72:267–279.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Heinrichs WL, Gellert RJ, Bakke JL, Lawrence NL. DDT administered to neonatal rats induces persistent estrus syndrome. Science (1971) 173:642–643.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Herbison AE. Multimodal influence of estrogen upon gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons. Endocr. Rev. (1998) 19:302–330.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Herbison AE, Pape JR. New evidence for estrogen receptors in gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons. Front. Neuroendocrinol. (2001) 22:292–308.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Herman-Giddens ME, Slora EJ, Wasserman RC, Bourdony CJ, Bhapkar MV, Koch GG, Hasemeier CM. Secondary sexual characteristics and menses in young girls seen in office practice: A study from the paediatric research in office settings network. Pediatrics (1997) 99:505–512.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Improta-Brears T, Whorton AR, Codazzi F, York JD, Meyer T, McDonnell DP. Estrogen-induced activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase requires mobilization of intracellular calcium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (1999) 96:4686–4691.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kelce WR, Stone CR, Laws SC, Gray LE, Kemppainen JA, Wilson EM. Persistent DDT metabolite p,p'-DDE is a potent androgen receptor antagonist. Nature (1995) 375:581–585.[CrossRef][Medline]

Krstevska-Konstantinova M, Charlier C, Craen M, Du Caju M, Heinrichs C, de Beaufort C, Plomteux G, Bourguignon JP. Sexual precocity after immigration from developing countries to Belgium: Evidence of previous exposure to organochlorine pesticides. Hum. Reprod. (2001) 16:1020–1026.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kuehl-Kovarik MC, Pouliot WA, Halterman GL, Handa RJ, Dudek FE, Partin KM. Episodic bursting activity and response to excitatory amino acids in acutely dissociated gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons genetically targeted with green fluorescent protein. J. Neurosci. (2002) 22:2313–2322.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kwon A, Stedman DB, Elswick BA, Cattley RC, Welsch F. Pubertal development and reproductive functions of Crl: CDBR Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to bisphenol A during prenatal and postnatal development. Toxicol. Sci. (2000) 55:399–406.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lagrange AH, Wagner EJ, Ronnekleiv OK, Kelly MJ. Rapid effects of estrogen to modulate G protein-coupled receptors via activation of protein kinase A and protein kinase C pathways. Steroids (1999) 64:64–75.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Lee PA, Guo SS, Kulin HE. Age of puberty: Data from the United States of America. APMIS (2001) 109:81–88.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Matagne V, Lebrethon MC, Gérard A, Bourguignon JP. Kainate/estrogen receptors and intracellular signalling pathways involved in estradiol rapid effects on gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion in vitro. Endocrinology (2005) 146:2313–2323.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Matagne V, Rasier G, Lebrethon MC, Gérard A, Bourguignon JP. Estradiol stimulation of pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion in vitro: Correlation with perinatal exposure to sex steroids and induction of sexual precocity in vivo. Endocrinology (2004) 145:2775–2783.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Miller KP, Gupta RK, Flaws JA. Methoxychlor metabolites may cause ovarian toxicity through estrogen-regulated pathways. Toxicol. Sci. (2006) 93:180–188.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mussi P, Ciana P, Raviscioni M, Villa R, Regondi S, Agradi E, Maggi A, Di Lorenzo D. Activation of brain estrogen receptors in mice lactating from mothers exposed to DDT. Brain Res. Bull. (2005) 65:241–247.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ohtake F, Takeyama KI, Matsumoto T, Kitagawa H, Yamamoto Y, Nohara K, Tohyama C, Krust A, Mimura J, Chambon P, et al. Modulation of estrogen receptor signalling by association with the activated dioxin receptor. Nature (2003) 423:545–550.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ojeda SR, Urbanski HF. Puberty in the Rat. In: In the Physiology of Reproduction—Knobil E, Neil JD, eds. (1994) Vol. 2. New York: Raven Press Ltd. 363–409.

Papanicolaou GN, Traut HF. The diagnostic value of vaginal smears in carcinoma of the uterus. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. (1941) 121:211–224.

Parent AS, Lebrethon MC, Gérard A, Bourguignon JP. Factors accounting for perinatal occurrence of pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion in vitro. Biol. Reprod. (2005) 72:143–149.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Parent AS, Teilmann G, Juul A, Skakkebaek NE, Toppari J, Bourguignon JP. The timing of normal puberty and the age limits of sexual precocity: Variations around the world, secular trends, and changes after migration. Endocr. Rev. (2003) 24:668–693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rasier G, Parent AS, Gérard A, Lebrethon MC, Bourguignon JP. Early maturation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion and sexual precocity after exposure of infant female rats to estradiol or dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane. Biol. Reprod. (2007) 77:734–742.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rasier G, Toppari J, Parent AS, Bourguignon JP. Female sexual maturation and reproduction after prepubertal exposure to estrogens and endocrine disrupting chemicals: A review of rodent and human data. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. (2006) 254–255:187–201.

Rubin BS, Lenkowski JR, Schaeberle CM, Vandenberg LN, Ronsheim PM, Soto A. Evidence of altered brain sexual differentiation in mice exposed perinatally to low, environmentally relevant levels of bisphenol A. Endocrinology (2006) 147:3681–3691.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Seminara SB, Kaiser UB. New gatekeepers of reproduction GPR54 and its cognate ligand, kiss-1. Endocrinology (2005) 146:1686–1688.[Free Full Text]

Teilmann G, Pedersen CB, Skakkebæk NE, Jensen TK. Increased risk of precocious puberty in internationally adopted children in Denmark. Pediatrics (2006) 118:391–399.[CrossRef]

Todd BJ, Schwarz JM, Mong JA, McCarthy MM. Glutamate AMPA/kainate receptors, not GABA(A) receptors, mediate estradiol-induced sex differences in the hypothalamus. Dev. Neurobiol. (2007) 67:304–315.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tomiyama N, Watanabe M, Takeda M, Harada T, Kobayashi H. A comparative study on the reliability of toxicokinetic parameters for predicting hepatotoxicity of DDT in rats receiving a single or repeated administration. J. Toxicol. Sci. (2003) 28:403–413.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tsurugizawa T, Mukai H, Tanabe N, Murakami G, Hojo Y, Kominami S, Mitsushashi K, Komatsuzaki Y, Morrison JH, Janssen WGM, et al. Estrogen induces rapid decrease in dendritic thorns of CA3 pyramidal neurons in adult male rat hippocampus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. (2005) 337:1345–1352.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Urbanski HF, Kohama SG, Garyfallou VT. Mechanisms mediating the response of gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons to excitatory amino acids. Rev. Reprod. (1996) 1:173–181.[Abstract]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
E. Diamanti-Kandarakis, J.-P. Bourguignon, L. C. Giudice, R. Hauser, G. S. Prins, A. M. Soto, R. T. Zoeller, and A. C. Gore
Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2009; 30(4): 293 - 342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/1/33    most recent
kfm285v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rasier, G.
Right arrow Articles by Bourguignon, J.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rasier, G.
Right arrow Articles by Bourguignon, J.-P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?