Skip Navigation

Toxicological Sciences 2008 103(2):411-413; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfn037
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eriksson, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Eriksson, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Response to: Use of the Pup as the Statistical Unit in Developmental Neurotoxicity Studies: Overlooked Model or Poor Research Design?

Per Eriksson

Department of Environmental Toxicology, Uppsala University, Sweden

Received February 11, 2008; accepted February 14, 2008

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Regarding the "Letter to the Editor" from Drs Hardy and Stedeford concerning our article "Co-exposure of neonatal mice to a flame retardant PBDE 99 (2,2',4,4',5-pentabromodiphenyl ether) and methyl mercury enhances developmental neurotoxic defects." The main comments and criticism are the use of the experimental design and its evaluation.

Although developmental toxicology is a relatively new science, it is firmly rooted in teratology. Consequently statistical evaluation is related to the situation where the mother is exposed and her fetus and offspring is exposed to a chemical via the placenta and the mother's milk. In such cases, not only is the genetic variable important but so too is uptake and distribution of the chemical in the mother, placental transfer, maternal, and fetal metabolism, etc. Exposure to a . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?