Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on April 29, 2008
Toxicological Sciences 2008 104(2):362-384; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfn084
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
104/2/362    most recent
kfn084v2
kfn084v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tyl, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Waechter, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tyl, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Waechter, J. M., Jr
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Two-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study of Dietary Bisphenol A in CD-1 (Swiss) Mice

Rochelle W. Tyl*,1, Christina B. Myers*, Melissa C. Marr*, Carol S. Sloan*, Nora P. Castillo*, M. Michael Veselica*, John C. Seely{dagger}, Stephen S. Dimond{ddagger}, John P. Van Miller§, Ronald N. Shiotsuka, Dieter Beyer||, Steven G. Hentges||| and John M. Waechter, Jr||||

* Health Sciences Unit, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 {dagger} Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 {ddagger} SABIC Innovative Plastics, Pittsfield, Massachusetts 02101 § Toxicology/Regulatory Services, Inc., Charlottesville, Virginia 22911 Bayer Material Science, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15205 || Bayer Healthcare AG, Wuppertal, Germany D-42096 ||| American Chemistry Council, Arlington, Virginia 22209 |||| The Dow Chemical Co., Midland, Michigan 48674

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Hermann Laboratory Bldg., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194. Fax: (919) 541-5956. E-mail: rwt{at}rti.org.

Received January 21, 2008; accepted April 15, 2008


   Abstract

Dietary bisphenol A (BPA) was evaluated in a mouse two-generation study at 0, 0.018, 0.18, 1.8, 30, 300, or 3500 ppm (0, 0.003, 0.03, 0.3, 5, 50, or 600 mg BPA/kg/day, 28 per sex per group). A concurrent positive control group of dietary 17β-estradiol (0.5 ppm; 28 per sex) confirmed the sensitivity of CD-1 mice to an endogenous estrogen. There were no BPA-related effects on adult mating, fertility or gestational indices, ovarian primordial follicle counts, estrous cyclicity, precoital interval, offspring sex ratios or postnatal survival, sperm parameters or reproductive organ weights or histopathology (including the testes and prostate). Adult systemic effects: at 300 ppm, only centrilobular hepatocyte hypertrophy; at 3500 ppm, reduced body weight, increased kidney and liver weights, centrilobular hepatocyte hypertrophy, and renal nephropathy in males. At 3500 ppm, BPA also reduced F1/F2 weanling body weight, reduced weanling spleen and testes weights (with seminiferous tubule hypoplasia), slightly delayed preputial separation (PPS), and apparently increased the incidence of treatment-related, undescended testes only in weanlings, which did not result in adverse effects on adult reproductive structures or functions; this last finding is considered a developmental delay in the normal process of testes descent. It is likely that these transient effects were secondary to (and caused by) systemic toxicity. Gestational length was increased by 0.3 days in F1/F2 generations; the toxicological significance, if any, of this marginal difference is unknown. At lower doses (0.018–30 ppm), there were no treatment-related effects and no evidence of nonmonotonic dose-response curves for any parameter. The systemic no observable effect level (NOEL) was 30 ppm BPA (~5 mg/kg/day); the reproductive/developmental NOEL was 300 ppm (~50 mg/kg/day). Therefore, BPA is not considered a selective reproductive or developmental toxicant in mice.

Key Words: bisphenol A; CAS No. 80-05-7; 17β-estradiol, CAS No. 50-28-2; CD-1 Swiss mice; two-generation reproductive toxicity study; OECD 416; puberty; andrology.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. Li, Z. Zhou, D. Qing, Y. He, T. Wu, M. Miao, J. Wang, X. Weng, J.R. Ferber, L.J. Herrinton, et al.
Occupational exposure to bisphenol-A (BPA) and the risk of Self-Reported Male Sexual Dysfunction
Hum. Reprod., November 10, 2009; (2009) dep381v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P. A. Hunt, M. Susiarjo, C. Rubio, and T. J. Hassold
The Bisphenol A Experience: A Primer for the Analysis of Environmental Effects on Mammalian Reproduction
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2009; 81(5): 807 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
Y.-J. Li, T.-B. Song, Y.-Y. Cai, J.-S. Zhou, X. Song, X. Zhao, and X.-L. Wu
Bisphenol A Exposure Induces Apoptosis and Upregulation of Fas/FasL and Caspase-3 Expression in the Testes of Mice
Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2009; 108(2): 427 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
L. N. Vandenberg, M. V. Maffini, C. Sonnenschein, B. S. Rubin, and A. M. Soto
Bisphenol-A and the Great Divide: A Review of Controversies in the Field of Endocrine Disruption
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2009; 30(1): 75 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.