Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on June 19, 2008
Toxicological Sciences 2008 105(1):33-43; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfn118
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/1/33    most recent
kfn118v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zwiernik, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Budinsky, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zwiernik, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Budinsky, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Toxicokinetics Of 2,3,7,8-TCDF and 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF in Mink (Mustela vison) at Ecologically Relevant Exposures

Matthew J. Zwiernik*,1, Steven Bursian{dagger}, Lesa L. Aylward{ddagger}, Denise P. Kay§, Jeremy Moore*, Craig Rowlands, Kent Woodburn, Melissa Shotwell§, Jong Seong Khim||, John P. Giesy*,|| and Robert A. Budinsky

* Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory, National Food Safety and Toxicology Center {dagger} Department of Animal Science, Center for Integrative Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824 {ddagger} Summit Toxicology, L.L.P., Falls Church, Virginia 22044 § Entrix, Inc., Okemos, Michigan 48864 The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan 48642 || Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences and Toxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7J 5B3, Canada

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: zwiernik{at}msu.edu. Tel: (517) 749-5243. Fax: (517) 432-2310.

Received September 7, 2008; accepted June 5, 2008


   Abstract

Wild mink (Mustela vison) living along the Tittabawassee River in central Michigan exhibit elevated hepatic and dietary polychlorinated dibenzofuran (PCDF) concentrations exceeding mink-specific, literature-reported toxicity reference values (TRVs) on a toxicity equivalents basis. However, no apparent effects on individuals or population are evident, suggesting that available TRVs may overpredict risk for the site-specific mix of congeners. To investigate this discrepancy, a 180-day spiked feed study was conducted to assess: (1) the dosages of key congeners necessary to achieve liver concentrations bracketing those observed in wild mink, (2) time to achieve steady-state concentrations, and (3) effect of coadministration of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran (TCDF) and 2,3,4,7,8-pentachlorodibenzofuran (4-PeCDF) on the toxicokinetics and distribution of each congener. Adipose and hepatic PCDF concentrations were measured at 0, 90, and 180 days. PCDF concentrations in mink scat were determined at several time points and indicated nearly complete absorption of both TCDF and 4-PeCDF from the diet. Elimination half-times of TCDF were < 15 h and were inversely proportional to dose, while those for 4-PeCDF were approximately 7–9 days with no clear dose dependency in the tested dose range. Coadministration of 4-PeCDF and TCDF accelerated clearance of TCDF compared to administration of TCDF alone. Clearance of 4-PeCDF was not affected by TCDF coadministration. Distribution of 4-PeCDF, but not TCDF, demonstrated increased hepatic sequestration with increasing dose. 4-PeCDF toxicokinetics were described using a previously published two-compartment model. Overall, the toxicokinetic information gathered here illustrates the impact of CYP1A1 induction on bioaccumulation and toxicity potential of TCDF and 4-PeCDF. This information may provide insight into why the current TRVs do not appear to correctly characterize the risk for these two congeners when they are the primary components of an environmental mixture.

Key Words: mink; polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (dioxins and furans); toxicokinetics; 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran; 2,3,4,7,8-pentachlorodibenzofuran.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
L. D. Burgoon, Q. Ding, A. N'jai, E. Dere, A. R. Burg, J. C. Rowlands, R. A. Budinsky, K. E. Stebbins, and T. R. Zacharewski
Automated Dose-Response Analysis of the Relative Hepatic Gene Expression Potency of TCDF in C57BL/6 Mice
Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2009; 112(1): 221 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.