Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GIBSON, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by CHRISTIAN, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by GIBSON, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by CHRISTIAN, M. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1989 Oxford University Press

research-article

Determination of the Developmental Toxicity Potential of Butoxypropanol in Rabbits after Topical Administration

W. B. GIBSON*, G. A. NOLEN* and M. S. CHRISTIAN{dagger}

*The Procter & Gamble Company, Miami Valley Laboratories P.O. Box 398707, Cincinnati, Ohio 45239-8707 {dagger}Argus Research Laboratories, Inc. 935 Horsham Road, Horsham, Pennsylvania 19044

Received August 12, 1988; accepted March 21, 1989

The developmental toxicity (embryofetotoxicity or teratogenicity) and maternal toxicity of butoxypropanol, a propylene glycol ether, was evaluated in New Zealand White rabbits. Dosages of 0 (water), 10, 44) or 100 mg/kg/day, selected on the basis of the water solubility of butoxypropanol and the results of a pilot study, were administered percutaneously to groups of artificially inseminated (Day 0) female rabbits on Days 7 through 18 of gestation. The dosage volume was 2 ml/kg. The control group contained 17 does and each test group contained 19 does. Does were observed for signs of test substance effect on abortion or premature delivery, body weight, and feed consumption. On Day 29, they were euthanized and examined for pregnancy, number and placement of implantations, early and late resorptions, and live fetuses. Pregnancy occurred in 15 control does (88%) and in 16 does in each test group (84%). There were no statistically significant differences between test and control groups for maternal body weight gain, feed consumption, number of corpora lutes per ovary, implantations, live fetuses, early and late resorptions, fetal body weights, gender, or gross external changes. There were no visceral or skeletal fetal alterations at any dose tested. No signs of maternal toxicity were observed; however, mild erythema occurred at the site of application at the 100 mg/kg/day dose level. The developmental no-effect level was greater than 100 mg/kg/day.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.