Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GRAY, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by COOPER, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by GRAY, L. E., JR
Right arrow Articles by COOPER, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1990 Oxford University Press

research-article

Carbendazim-lnduced Alterations of Reproductive Development and Function in the Rat and Hamster1

L. EARL GRAY, JR, JOSEPH OSTBY, RALPH LINDER, JEROME GOLDMAN, GEORGIA REHNBERG and RALPH COOPER

Developmental Reproductive Biology, Endocrinology & Gerontology, and Gamete Biology Sections, Reproductive Toxicology Branch, DTD, Health Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711

Received November 27, 1989; accepted April 17, 1990

Carbendazim-lnduced Alterations of Reproductive Development and Function in the Rat and Hamster. GRAY, L. E., JR., OSTBY, J., LINDER, R., GOLDMAN, J., REHNBERG, G., AND COOPER, R. (1990). Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 15, 281–297. We are developing a data base that will allow us to select endpoints that would be useful in the detection of reproductive toxicity in a multigenerational test. In this effort, carbendazim (MBC), a known reproductive toxicant, was administered to male and female rats from weaning, through puberty, gestation, and lactation. A similar study was conducted with hamsters. In rats, MBC was administered at 0, 50, 100,200, or 400 mg/kg/day. Hamsters were dosed at 0 or 400 mg/kg/day. In the parent (P0) generation, landmarks of puberty were measured. In females, estrous cyclicity, litter size, the number of implants, organ weights, and histology were assessed. Our assessment of the male rat included organ weights, testicular and epididymal sperm counts, a quantitative measure of sperm motil-ity, sperm morphology, testicular histology, and endocrine measures. The growth, viability, and reproductive function of the offspring (Fl) were observed during a 4jmonth period of continuous breeding. In the P0 of both species, MBC did not alter pubertal development, growth, or viability. The reproductive potential of the rats treated with M BC at 200 and 400 mg/kg/day was reduced due to effects on sperm production and fetal viability. In the male rat, MBC treatment markedly altered sperm morphology, testicular and epididymal weights, and sperm numbers and testicular histology. Fertility, sperm motility, and hormonal levels were altered, primarily in the males with very low sperm counts. The ability to conceive did not appear to involve a female factor. In P0 female rats, MBC administration caused postimplantation losses in the high-dosage groups and a few malformed rat pups were found in the litters from the 100 and 200 treatment groups. MBC was less toxic to the hamster than the rat. The only reproductive effects induced by MBC treatment were on sperm measures. Fertility of the P0 generation and fetal and neonatal (Fl) viability were not decreased by MBC administration. In the male rat, testis weight, sperm numbers in the cauda epididymis and testis and sperm morphology were sensitive to the effects of MBC. In females, counting implantation scars at necropsy was useful, as this information allowed us to confirm pregnancy and identify postimplantation losses induced by MBC administration


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.