Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SCHAPER, M.
Right arrow Articles by DETWILER, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by SCHAPER, M.
Right arrow Articles by DETWILER, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1991 Oxford University Press

other

Evaluation of the Acute Respiratory Effects of Aerosolized Machining Fluids in Mice

MICHELLE SCHAPER1 and KATHERINE DETWILER

The Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261

Received June 4, 1990; accepted September 11, 1990

Using a previously developed bioassay, the sensory and pulmonary irritating properties of a group of 10 aerosolized machining fluids were evaluated in mice. Single, 3-hr inhalation exposures were conducted with the fluids at exposure concentrations-ranging from 20 to 2000 mg/m3. The results have shown that all 10 were capable of inducing sensory and pulmonary irritation, with little or no change in pulmonary histopathology. A concentration-response relationship was developed for each fluid which revealed that, for the 10 fluids studied here, the synthetic/semisynthetic and soluble fluids were more potent irritants than the straight oils. Also, 3 of the 10 fluids which had been collected from workplace operations (i.e., "in use" fluids) were found to be similar in potency to the same fluids prior to their introduction into the workplace (i.e., "neat" fluids). From concentration-response relationships, the RD50 value (i.e., concentration inducing a 50% response) was obtained for each of the 10 fluids. The RD50 values ranged from 100 to 1000 mg/m3 for all fluids except the straight oils whose RD50 values were over 100,000 mg/m3. Using these values, exposure limits were then suggested for workers in industry to prevent irritation. This bioassay may be a good first step in evaluating new machining fluids whose formulations may change depending upon the current industrial needs.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.