Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WRIGHT, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by CHRISLIP, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by WRIGHT, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by CHRISLIP, D. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 Oxford University Press

research-article

Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity of N,N-Diethyl-m-toluamide in Rats

DOLLIS M. WRIGHT1, BRYAN D. HARDIN, PHILLIP W. GOAD*,2 and DAVID W. CHRISLIP

Division of Biomedical and Behavioral Science, Nalional Institute for Ocaipational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control Cincinnati, Ohio *Intox Laboratories, Inc. Redfield, Arkansas

Received August 9, 1991; accepted January 7, 1992

N,N-Diethyl-m-toluamide (mDET, DEET) is widely used as a topical insect repellent. It is the active ingredient in many consumer formulations, which usually contain 10–25% mDET in an alcohol base. More concentrated consumer products are also available, including some that are pure technical grade mDET. Persons living or employed in mosquito-infested areas may have very high seasonal exposures to mDET. Because contradictory reports had been published on the reproductive and developmental toxicity of mDET, a series of studies was conducted in male and female Sprague-Dawley rats. All treatments were administered by daily subcutaneous injections of undiluted mDET. A dose finding study was done using 12 time-mated females per group treated on Gestational Days (GD) 6–15 with 0.50, 0.62, 0.78, 0.92, or 1.2 ml mDET /kg/day. No females survived 10 days of mDET dosing with 1.2 ml/kg/day. Deaths occurred in all other groups except the low dose (0.50 ml/kg/ day). Pregnant females treated on GD 6–15 with 0 or 0.30 ml/ kg/day were used for the teratology study. Half of each group was euthanized on GD 20: the second half was singly housed in nesting boxes and allowed to deliver litters. Live pups were counted and weighed soon after birth on Postnatal Day (PD) 0 and again on PD 3, 9, and 14. Proven fertile males were treated 5 days/week for 9 weeks with 0, 0.30, 0.73, 1.15, or 1.80 ml mDET /kg/day for a male dose-finding study. Each group consisted of 20 males. No males survived the 1.80 ml/kg/day. Deaths occurred in all remaining dose groups except the 0.30 ml/kg/ day and control group. Immediately following the final treatment of the male dose study, 11 males were randomly selected from the 0.30 and 0.73 ml/kg/day groups. They were cohabited for 7 days with 4 females per male during post-treatment Weeks 1 and 2. Half of the females were euthanized 12–14 days after the last day of cohabitation for a dominant lethal study; the remaining females were singly housed in nesting boxes and allowed to deliver litters. Live pups were counted and weighed on PD 0 and 3. There was no evidence of reproductive or developmental toxicity in any of these assays, but there were signs of neuro-toxicity in treated adult male and female rats, which may relate to reports of neurotoxicity in humans heavily exposed to mDET -containing insect repellents, o 1992 society of Toxicology.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.