Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WESTER, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by WANG, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by WESTER, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by WANG, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 Oxford University Press

research-article

In Vivo and in Vitro Percutaneous Absorption and Skin Evaporation of Isofenphos in Man

RONALD C. WESTER*, HOWARD I. MAIBACH*, JOSEPH MELENDRES*, LENA SEDIK*, JAMES KNAAK{dagger} and RHODA WANG{ddagger}

*Department of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, California {dagger}Occidental Chemical Corporation Niagara Falls, New York 14302 {ddagger}Department of Food and Agriculture State of California, Sacramento, California

Received September 19, 1991; accepted May 21, 1992

Studies were done to determine the percutaneous absorption of isofenphos in human volunteers from whom informed consent had been obtained. In vivo absorption in man was 3.6±3.6% of applied dose for 24-hr exposure and 3.6±0.5% for 72-hr exposure. Skin wash recovery data show that isofenphos evaporates from in vivo skin during the absorption process; the surface dose is minimal (<1%) by 24 hr. Skin stripping showed no residual isofenphos in stratum corneum. This explains the similar absorption for 24 and 72-hr dose prewash exposures. Skin surface recovery in vivo with soap and water was 61.4±10.4 for the first dosing time (15 mm). Time-recovery response declined with time to 0.5±0.2% at 24 hr. In vitro absorption utilizing flow-through diffusion methodology with human cadaver skin and human plasma receptor fluid gave 2.5±2.0% dose absorbed, an amount similar to In vivo studies. An additional 6.5±24% was recovered in the skin samples (total of 9%). Skin surface wash at 24 hr recovered 79.7±2.2% and skin content was 6.5±2.4% (total dose accountability of 88.7±4.6%). Thus, isofenphos was available for absorption during the whole dosing period. Neither in vitro absorption nor in vitro evaporation studies predicted the potential skin evaporation of isofenphos. Published dermal studies in the rat had predicted isofenphos absorption at 47% of applied dose (12-fold greater than actual in man). Subsequent toxicokinetic modeling predicted possible concern with the use of isofenphos. This is an example where the choice of the rat produced a nonrelevant absorption prediction. In vivo studies in human volunteers seem more relevant for predicting percutaneous absorption in man.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.