Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SEILKOP, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by SEILKOP, S. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Oxford University Press

research-article

The Effect of Body Weight on Tumor Incidence and Carcinogenicity Testing in B6C3F1 Mice and F344 Rats

S. K. SEILKOP

Analytical Sciences, Inc. 100 Capitola Drive, Suite 100, Durham, North Carolina 27713

Received April 19, 1994; accepted July 21, 1994

Associations between animal body weights and tumor incidence were examined using individual control animal data from 55 mouse and 53 rat studies conducted by the National Toxicology Program. Several statistically significant associations were found, the strongest of which were positive relationships between body weight and risk of liver tumors in both sexes of mice, pituitary gland tumors in both sexes of rats, and mammary gland tumors in female rats. The most compelling evidence that these relationships were causal in nature was the replication of the correlations across individual experiments. In addition, significant correlations between tumor occurrence and body weights occurred in animals as young as 9 weeks of age. Logistic regression models relating 12-month body weight to tumor risk were developed for the strongest relationships, and utilized in the reanalysis of tumor data from two National Toxicology Program studies with treatment-related decreases in body weight. A simulation study based on the logistic regression models indicated that statistical power to detect a treatment-related increase in tumor incidence can be seriously diminished when mean body weight in treated animals is depressed by as little as 10%. Conversely, when mean body weight in control animals is 10% lower than that of treated animals, false positive rates can increase to 20–30%. The severity of the effects of such commonly observed treatment-related disparities in body weight suggests that alternative data analysis methods or experimental designs should be considered to address this potential problem in carcinogenicity testing.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.