Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ELLIS, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by COHN, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by ELLIS, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by COHN, S. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1983 Oxford University Press

research-article

Evaluation of Biological Indicators of Body Burden of Cadmium in Humans

KENNETH J. ELLIS*, SEIICHI YASUMURA, DAVID VARTSKY and STANTON H. COHN

Medical Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973

Evaluation of Biological Indicators of Body Burden of Cadmium in Humans. Ellis, K.J., Yasumura, S., Vartsky, D. and Cohn, S.H. (1983). Fundam. Appl. Toxicol.. 3:169-174. The cadmium content in the left kidney (KCd) and concentration in the liver (LCd) were measured in vivo in 51 adult male workers actively employed at a cadmium plant and in 10 nonexposed controls. Cadmium levels in blood (BCd), urine (UCd) and hair (HCd) were also obtained for each subject. When the workers were classified on the basis of urinary excretion of ß2-microglobulin, albumin and total protein, 33 workers were judged to have normal renal function, and 18 workers were found to have renal dysfunction. In the two groups of industrial workers the mean value for each biological index of cadmium exposure was statistically elevated when compared with the mean value for the controls. Examination of the interrelationships among KCd, LCd, BCd, UCd and HCd provided the following conclusions: (a) Only on a group basis was UCd correlated (r=0.61) with KCd in workers with normal renal function; (b) BCd was corrected with LCd in workers with normal kidney function (r=0.53) and in workers with renal dysfunction (r=0.68); (c) HCd had the largest variability of the biological indices and was unrelated to body burden; (d) KCd and LCd were positively correlated in workers with normal kidney function, whereas KCd decreased with increasing LCd in workers with renal dysfunction. This study demonstrates that the qualitative nature of the relationship of BCd, UCd and HCd (biological indices of exposure) with KCd and LCd (body burden) is not sufficiently quantitative for predicting the body burden of an individual worker.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.