© 1983 Oxford University Press
correction |
Errata
In the "Letters to the Editor", which appeared in the May/June issue of Fundamental and Applied Toxicology (3:3/a5/a), the letter written by J.K. Haseman, J.E. Huff and J.A. Moore had a typographical error.Below is the corrected paragraph.
"... Thus, for the data cited as examples by Salsburg (1983), there is in fact no inconsistency in interpretation. The clearly positive effect was regarded as chemically induced; the negative and marginal effects were regarded as artifacts."
Our apology for any inconvenience this error may have caused.