Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BLACK, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by FRANCIS, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by BLACK, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by FRANCIS, P. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1983 Oxford University Press

research-article

Comparative Aquatic Toxicology of Aromatic Hydrocarbons*

JEFFREY A. BLACKA, WESLEY J. BIRGEA, ALBERT G. WESTERMANA and PAUL C. FRANCISB

AT.H. Morgan School of Biological Sciences and Graduate Center for Toxicology, University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506 BToxicology Division, Lilly Research Laboratories Greenfield, IN 46140

Comparative Aquatic Toxicology of Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Black, J.A., Birge, W.J., Westerman, A.G., and Francis, P.C. (1983) Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 3:353–358. Structure-toxicity relationships were investigated for six organic contaminants, representative of three chemical classes, likely to be found in coal conversion process waters and effluents. Using embryo-larval stages of the rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) and largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), continuous-flow toxicity tests were performed on hydroxylated aromatic hydrocarbons (phenol, ß-naphthol), azaarenes (quinoline, acridine), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (naphthalene, phenanthrene). Exposure was initiated at fertilization and maintained through 4 days post-hatching. Median lethal concentrations (LC50), based on combined frequencies of embryo-larval mortality and tera-togenesis, were used to rank the toxicity of the compounds to each fish species. With the trout, the order of decreasing toxicity was phenanthrene (0.04 mg/L), ß-naphthol (0.07 mg/L), naphthalene (0.11 mg/L), phenol (0.15 mg/L), acridine (0.32 mg/ L) and quinoline (11.0 mg/L). The toxicological ranking with the bass was phenanthrene (0.18 mg/L), naphthalene (0.51 mg/L), acridine (1.02 mg/L), ß-naphthol (1.77 mg/L), phenol (2.80 mg/ L) and quinoline (7.50 mg/L). For each class of compounds, the chemical with the greater number of aromatic rings always exerted the greater toxicity. In tests with both fish species, ß-naphthol (two rings) was about twice as toxic as phenol (one ring), and phenanthrene (three rings) was nearly three times more toxic than naphthalene (two rings). Acridine (three rings) was seven times more toxic to bass and 34 times more toxic to trout than was quinoline (two rings). This relationship between ring number and toxicity was in excellent agreement with results from acute tests on the same compounds. Furthermore, a close correlation existed between toxicity and n-octanol: water partition coefficients within each class of compounds.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.