Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FEUSTON, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by MACKERER, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by FEUSTON, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by MACKERER, C. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

Systemic and Developmental Toxicity of Dermally Applied Distillate Aromatic Extract in Rats

M. H. FEUSTON, C. E. HAMILTON and C. R. MACKERER

Stonybrook Laboratories Inc. P.O. Box 1029, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-1029

Received July 11, 1995; accepted December 7, 1995

Distillate aromatic extract (DAE) was evaluated for subchronic and developmental toxicity. In the subchronic study, undiluted DAE was applied on the shaved backs of male and female rats at dose levels of 0, 30, 125, 500, and 1250 mg/kg for 13 weeks, 5 days per week. Exposure sites were not covered. In the developmental toxicity study, DAE was similarly applied, but to pregnant rats at dose levels of 0, 8, 30, and 125 mg/kg on Gestation Days 0–19, 500 mg/kg on Gestation Days 0–16, and 1000 mg/kg on Gestation Days 10–12. Evidence of toxicity observed in the subchronic study included death, decreased body weights, aberrant serum chemistry and hematology values, altered organ weights, and histopathologic changes in a variety of organs. Regardless of the length of the exposure period, DAE was toxic to the developing conceptus. Evidence of developmental toxicity observed included increased resorptions and reduced fetal body weights. Cleft palate and ossification delays were observed in fetuses exposed in utero to DAE on Gestation Days 10–12, but not when exposure spanned all (Gestation Days 0–19) or most (Gestation Days 0–16) of gestation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.