Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DEPASS, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by YANG, R. S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DEPASS, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by YANG, R. S. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1984 Oxford University Press

research-article

Dermal Oncogenicity Studies on Ethyienediamine in Male C3H Mice1

LINVAL R. DEPASS, EDWARD H. FOWLER and RAYMOND S. H. YANG2

Bushy Run Research Center, Mellon Institute-Union Carbide Corporation, R.D 4, Mellon Road, Export, Pennsylvania 15632

Dermal Oncogenicity Studies on Ethylenediamine in Male C3H Mice, DEPASS, L. R., FOWLER, E H., AND YANG, R. S. H. (1984). Fundam. Appl. Toxicoi. 4, 641–645. The dermal oncogenic potential of ethylenediamine (EDA) was assessed by applying 25 µl of a 1% solution in deionized water to the skin of 50 male C3H/HeJ mice. This was the highest concentration not producing irritation or weight changes in a preliminary 2-week study. Two EDA samples (Nos. 1 and 2) from different production sources were tested. Applications were made thrice weekly until the death of the animals. A negative control group received deionized water only. This group and the EDA-treated groups were individually housed. A fourth group of 40 mice, housed 5 per cage, received 0.1% 3-methylcholanthrene (MC in acetone as a positive control substance. A fifth group of 40 mice, housed 5 per cage, also received deionized water to determine the effect of group housing on survival. No skin tumors were observed in the EDA-treated groups. In the positive control group, however, 39 animals (98%) had skin tumors including 37 (92%) with confirmed squamous cell carcinomas. Eleven mice (22%) which received EDA No. 1 had dermal fibrosis indicative of probable skin irritation in this group; there was no such lesion in the controls. The mean survival times were 639, 626, and 598 days for the EDA No. 1, water control, and EDA No. 2 groups, respectively. The survival time of the EDA No. 2 group was significantly reduced compared to the individually housed water controls by one of two statistical tests. Irrespective of this difference, the study is considered to be a valid assessment of the oncogenic potential of EDA No. 2 because the magnitude of the difference in mean survival time was small. The group-housed water controls showed markedly reduced survival time (mean = 488 days) compared to the singly housed controls. Neither EDA sample was oncogenic under the conditions of this study.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.