Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fechter, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Crofton, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fechter, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Crofton, K. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Oxford University Press

other

Trichloroethylene Ototoxicity: Evidence for a Cochlear Origin1

Laurence D. Fechter*,2, Ye Liu*,2, David W. Herr{dagger} and Kevin M. Crofton{dagger},3

*Toxicology Program, The University of Oklahoma College of Pharmacy Oklahoma City, Oklahoma {dagger}Neurotoxicology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park North Carolina 27711

Received July 14, 1997; accepted November 30, 1997

Trichloroethylene (TCE) is known to produce an unusual pattern of hearing impairment in laboratory animals marked by a preferential loss of threshold sensitivity at midfrequencies. The purpose of this research was to determine whether the TCE-induced auditory deficit results from cochlear dysfunction. Adult Long Evans hooded rats were exposed via inhalation to either 0 (clean air) or 4000 ppm TCE (6 h/day for 5 days). Auditory thresholds for 1–40 kHz tones were determined 3 weeks after exposure using reflex modification audiometry (RMA; n = 12/ group). Cochlear electropotentials were measured during subsequent testing (n = 3–10/group) 5 to 7 weeks after exposure, including thresholds for cochlear action potentials (CAP) and the 1-µV cochlear microphonic for 2–40 kHz tones, and the N1 amplitude intensity function (40–90 dB SPL). Cochlear histopathology was assessed in midmodiolar preparations of a separate set of animals, exposed as before (n = 4/group). RMA testing confirmed a TCE-induced loss in midfrequency threshold sensitivity (8 and 16 kHz). CAP thresholds were elevated at midfrequencies (8 and 16 kHz) among TCE-treated subjects, along with a suppression of the N1 amplitude from 50 to 90 dB SPL. The cochlear microphonic, a nonpropagated ac potential generated largely by the outer hair cells, was not affected by the TCE treatment. Cochlear histopathology revealed a loss of spiral ganglion cells that was significant in the middle turn, but not in the basal turn. There was an inconsistent loss of hair cells among treated subjects. The data suggest strongly that the behaviorally determined loss in auditory function can be accounted for by a cochlear impairment and that the spiral ganglion cell may be a prominent target of TCE.

Key Words: trichloroethylene; ototoxicity; cochlea; spiral ganglion cell.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
A Vyskocil, T Leroux, G Truchon, F Lemay, F Gagnon, M Gendron, and C Viau
Ototoxicity of trichloroethylene in concentrations relevant for the working environment
Human and Experimental Toxicology, March 1, 2008; 27(3): 195 - 200.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
L. D. Fechter, G.-D. Chen, and D. L. Johnson
Potentiation of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss by Low Concentrations of Hydrogen Cyanide in Rats
Toxicol. Sci., March 1, 2002; 66(1): 131 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
L. D. Fechter, G.-D. Chen, D. Rao, and J. Larabee
Predicting Exposure Conditions that Facilitate the Potentiation of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss by Carbon Monoxide
Toxicol. Sci., December 1, 2000; 58(2): 315 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.