Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Linkov, I.
Right arrow Articles by Gray, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Linkov, I.
Right arrow Articles by Gray, G. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Oxford University Press

other

Weight and Survival Depression in Rodent Bioassays with and without Tumor Decreases

Igor Linkov*, Richard Wilson* and George M. Gray{dagger},1

{dagger}Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Harvard School of Public Health 718 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 *Department of Physics, Harvard University, Jefferson Laboratories Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138

Received September 15, 1997; accepted February 3, 1998

It has been suggested that the decreased tumor rates (anticarcinogenicity) commonly observed in the National Toxicology Program (NTP) rodent bioassays may be caused by compound-induced decreases in body weight or decreases in survival of treated animals, hi this study, weight decrement and survival depression following chemical treatment was studied for those chemicals which induce site specific decreases in tumor rates (anticarcinogens) and those which do not (non-anticarcinogens) in a database of 312 chemicals tested in the NTP bioassay program prior to 1983. There is an evident difference in weight depression and animal survival between anticarcinogens and non-anticarcinogens but it is small relative to the variability between chemicals in the two groups. We argue that weight or survival depression cannot, in a simple way, explain the difference between anticarcinogenic and non-anticarcinogenic chemicals. In fact, there are a number of chemicals that are anticarcinogenic with no evidence of weight or survival depression and many chemicals that cause significant weight or survival decreases with no apparent anticarcinogenic effects. There is a small but statistically insignificant relationship between the degree of weight depression and the number of tumor sites found to have lower tumor rates in treated animals. These analyses suggest that biological factors other than weight and survival depression are involved in decreased tumor rates in rodent bioassays. These results, and those of the companion paper (I. Linkov et al., this issue), suggest that the anticarcinogenic responses observed in rodent cancer bioassays should be carefully considered in evaluations of the overall carcinogenic potential of chemicals.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
G. M. Gray, I. Linkov, M. Polkanov, and R. Wilson
Liver adenomas and carcinomas: correlations and relationship to body weight in long-term rodent cancer bioassays
Toxicology and Industrial Health, July 1, 2000; 16(6): 211 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
G M Gray
Rodent cancer bioassays -- is body weight depression hormetic?
Human and Experimental Toxicology, June 1, 2000; 19(6): 332 - 334.
[PDF]

Home page
 Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
I. Linkov, M. Polkanov, A. Shagiakhmetov, R. Wilson, and G. M. Gray
Correlations among tumor types in mouse cancer bioassays: liver adenomas, liver carcinomas, leukemias and lymphomas
Toxicology and Industrial Health, February 1, 2000; 16(1): 16 - 40.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.