| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 1998 Oxford University Press
research-article |
Controlled Ethyl tert-Butyl Ether (ETBE) Exposure of Male Volunteers
II. Acute Effects
,1
*Department of Occupational Medicine, National Institute for Working Life SE-171 84 Solna, Sweden
Institute of Environmental Medicine, Division of Toxicology, Karolinska Institute Solna, Sweden
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital Uppsala, Sweden
Received December 31, 1997; accepted June 3, 1998
The aim of this study was to evaluate acute effects of ethyl tert-butyl ether (ETBE) in man after short-term exposure. ETBE may in the future replace methyl tert-butyl ether, a widely used oxygenate in unleaded gasoline. Eight healthy male volunteers were exposed to ETBE vapor for 2 h at four levels (0, 5, 25, and 50 ppm) during light physical exercise. The subjects rated irritative symptoms, discomfort, and central nervous system effects in a questionnaire. Ocular (eye redness, tear film break-up time, conjunctival epithelial damage, and blinking frequency), nasal (acoustic rhinometry and analysis of inflammatory markers and cells in nasal lavage fluid), and pulmonary (peak expiratory flow, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, forced vital capacity, vital capacity, and transfer factor) measurements were performed. Significantly increased ratings of solvent smell (p = 0.001, repeated-measures ANOVA) were seen during exposures and correlated to exposure levels. Furthermore, significantly elevated ratings of discomfort in throat and airways were seen during and after 50 ppm compared to the control exposure (p = 0.02). Increased nasal swelling (p = 0.001) and blinking frequency (p = 0.01) were noted at all exposure levels, but their magnitudes were not related to exposure levels. A slightly impaired pulmonary function was seen at 25 and 50 ppm, since forced vital capacity (p = 0.02) and vital capacity (p = 0.04) differed significantly from the clean air exposure. Although the impairments seemed to fall within normal inter- and intraindividual variation and have no clinical relevance as such, it cannot be excluded that other individuals may react more severely than eight healthy male volunteers in this study.
Key Words: acute health effects; ethyl tert-butyl ether; gasoline; human; inhalation exposure; oxygenated fuel; tert-butyl alcohol.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. Ernstgard, E. Shibata, and G. Johanson Uptake and Disposition of Inhaled Methanol Vapor in Humans Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2005; 88(1): 30 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P Wolkoff, J K Nojgaard, P Troiano, and B Piccoli Eye complaints in the office environment: precorneal tear film integrity influenced by eye blinking efficiency Occup. Environ. Med., January 1, 2005; 62(1): 4 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L Ernstgard, E Gullstrand, A Lof, and G Johanson Are women more sensitive than men to 2-propanol and m-xylene vapours? Occup. Environ. Med., November 1, 2002; 59(11): 759 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. A. M. SMEETS, C. MAUTE, and P. H. DALTON Acute Sensory Irritation from Exposure to Isopropanol (2-Propanol) at TLV in Workers and Controls: Objective versus Subjective Effects Ann. Hyg., June 1, 2002; 46(4): 359 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|