Toxicological Sciences 58, 15-22 (2000)
Copyright © 2000 by the Society of Toxicology
Biotransformation and Toxicokinetics |
Comparative in Vitro–in Vivo Percutaneous Absorption of the Pesticide Propoxur
TNO Nutrition and Food Research,
* Department of Explanatory Toxicology,
Department of Target Organ Toxicology, and
§ Department of Toxicological Risk Assessment, PO Box 360, 3700 AJ, Zeist, the Netherlands; and
TNO Prins Maurits Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, PO Box 45, 2280 AA, Rijswijk, the Netherlands
In vitro and in vivo skin absorption of the pesticide propoxur (2-isopropoxyphenyl N-methyl carbamate, commercially BaygonTM and Unden TM; log Po/w 1.56, MW 209.2) was investigated. In vivo studies were performed in rats and human volunteers, applying the test compound to the dorsal skin and the volar aspect of the forearm, respectively. In vitro experiments were carried out in static diffusion cells using viable full-thickness skin membranes (rat and human), non-viable epidermal membranes (rat and human) and a perfused-pig-ear model. Percutaneous penetration of propoxur in human volunteers was measured by analysis of its metabolite (2-isopropoxyphenol) in blood and urine; in all other studies radiolabeled propoxur ([ring-U-14C]propoxur) was used. In order to allow for direct comparison, experimental conditions were standardized with respect to dose (150 µg propoxur per cm2), vehicle (60% aqueous ethanol) and exposure time (4 h). In human volunteers, it was found that approximately 6% of the applied dose was excreted via the urine after 24 h, while the potential absorbed dose (amount applied minus amount washed off) was 23 µg/cm2. In rats these values were 21% and 88 µg/cm2, respectively. Data obtained in vitro were almost always higher than those obtained in human volunteers. The most accurate in vitro prediction of the human in vivo percutaneous absorption of propoxur was obtained on the basis of the potential absorbed dose. The absorbed dose and the maximal flux in viable full-thickness skin membranes correlated reasonably well with the human in vivo situation (maximal overestimation by a factor of 3). Epidermal membranes overestimated the human in vivo data up to a factor of 8, but the species-differences observed in vivo were reflected correctly in this model. The data generated in the perfused-pig-ear model were generally intermediate between viable skin membranes and epidermal membranes.
Key Words: in vitro/in vivo comparisons; perfused-pig-ear model; viable skin and epidermal membranes; propoxur; rat; human.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  I Jakasa and S Kezic Evaluation of in-vivo animal and in-vitro models for prediction of dermal absorption in man Human and Experimental Toxicology, April 1, 2008; 27(4): 281 - 288. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S Kezic Methods for measuring in-vivo percutaneous absorption in humans Human and Experimental Toxicology, April 1, 2008; 27(4): 289 - 295. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. M. Brand, J. L. Jendrzejewski, E. M. Henery, and A. R. Charron A Single Oral Dose of Ethanol Can Alter Transdermal Absorption of Topically Applied Chemicals in Rats Toxicol. Sci., August 1, 2006; 92(2): 349 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B Van Ravenzwaay and E Leibold A comparison between in vitro rat and human and in vivo rat skin absorption studies Human and Experimental Toxicology, September 1, 2004; 23(9): 421 - 430. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|