Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flint, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Tinkle, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Flint, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Tinkle, S. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences 62, 250-256 (2001)
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Toxicology


ENDOCRINE TOXICOLOGY

C57BL/6 Mice Are Resistant to Acute Restraint Modulation of Cutaneous Hypersensitivity

Melanie S. Flint and Sally S. Tinkle1,

Toxicology and Molecular Biology Branch, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1095 Willowdale Road, MS 3014, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505

C57BL/6 mice, in contrast to BALB/c mice, display minimal behavioral changes in response to environmental stressors and are considered relatively stress-resistant. We have shown that application of acute restraint prior to chemical challenge enhanced cutaneous hypersensitivity (CHS) in BALB/c mice and that this enhanced response is partially glucocorticoid dependent. Due to strain differences in the immune response and in the response to environmental stressors, we hypothesized that acute restraint would not enhance CHS in the less stress-sensitive C57BL/6 mice. We sensitized and challenged C57BL/6 mice with the contact sensitizer, 2, 4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) in the presence and absence of restraint. Acute restraint, applied prior to chemical challenge, significantly increased serum corticosterone, but to concentrations approximately 60% of those reported for BALB/c mice. Neither restraint nor the exogenous administration of corticosterone enhanced chemical-induced ear swelling in C57BL/6 mice. Pharmacological interruption of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis (HPAA) with the glucocorticoid type II receptor antagonist, RU486, did not alter the development of CHS, however, adrenalectomized (ADX) mice exhibited decreased ear swelling, a measurement that was decreased further by restraint. Combined application of acute restraint and corticosterone prior to chemical challenge significantly enhanced the ear swelling response in C57BL/6 wild-type mice. These data confirm that C57BL/6 mice have a blunted corticosterone response to restraint and that acute restraint does not modulate cutaneous hypersensitivity. Furthermore, our data demonstrate that stress-resistance is not conferred exclusively through the glucocorticoid pathways.

Key Words: stress; corticosterone; RU486; skin; sensitization.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
C. A. Newton, T. Lu, S. J. Nazian, I. Perkins, H. Friedman, and T. W. Klein
The THC-induced suppression of Th1 polarization in response to Legionella pneumophila infection is not mediated by increases in corticosterone and PGE2
J. Leukoc. Biol., October 1, 2004; 76(4): 854 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
O. A. Tjurmina, I. Armando, J. M. Saavedra, D. S. Goldstein, and D. L. Murphy
Exaggerated Adrenomedullary Response to Immobilization in Mice with Targeted Disruption of the Serotonin Transporter Gene
Endocrinology, December 1, 2002; 143(12): 4520 - 4526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.