Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kimbell, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kimbell, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, F. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences 64, 111-121 (2001)
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Toxicology


RESPIRATORY TOXICOLOGY

Dosimetry Modeling of Inhaled Formaldehyde: Binning Nasal Flux Predictions for Quantitative Risk Assessment

J. S. Kimbell*,1, J. H. Overton{dagger}, R. P. Subramaniam*,2, P. M. Schlosser*, K. T. Morgan*,3, R. B. Conolly* and F. J. Miller*

* CIIT Centers for Health Research, P.O. Box 12137, 6 Davis Drive, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709; and {dagger} Experimental Toxicology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711

Interspecies extrapolations of tissue dose and tumor response have been a significant source of uncertainty in formaldehyde cancer risk assessment. The ability to account for species-specific variation of dose within the nasal passages would reduce this uncertainty. Three-dimensional, anatomically realistic, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models of nasal airflow and formaldehyde gas transport in the F344 rat, rhesus monkey, and human were used to predict local patterns of wall mass flux (pmol/[mm2-h-ppm]). The nasal surface of each species was partitioned by flux into smaller regions (flux bins), each characterized by surface area and an average flux value. Rat and monkey flux bins were predicted for steady-state inspiratory airflow rates corresponding to the estimated minute volume for each species. Human flux bins were predicted for steady-state inspiratory airflow at 7.4, 15, 18, 25.8, 31.8, and 37 l/min and were extrapolated to 46 and 50 l/min. Flux values higher than half the maximum flux value (flux median) were predicted for nearly 20% of human nasal surfaces at 15 l/min, whereas only 5% of rat and less than 1% of monkey nasal surfaces were associated with fluxes higher than flux medians at 0.576 l/min and 4.8 l/min, respectively. Human nasal flux patterns shifted distally and uptake percentage decreased as inspiratory flow rate increased. Flux binning captures anatomical effects on flux and is thereby a basis for describing the effects of anatomy and airflow on local tissue disposition and distributions of tissue response. Formaldehyde risk models that incorporate flux binning derived from anatomically realistic CFD models will have significantly reduced uncertainty compared with risk estimates based on default methods.

Key Words: formaldehyde; nasal passages; nasal airflow; nasal uptake; F344 rat; rhesus monkey; human; regional dosimetry; local dosimetry; computational fluid dynamics.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
R. B. Conolly, F. J. Miller, J. S. Kimbell, and D. Janszen
Formaldehyde Risk Assessment
Ann. Hyg., March 1, 2009; 53(2): 181 - 184.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
K. S. Crump, C. Chen, J. F. Fox, C. Van Landingham, and R. Subramaniam
Sensitivity Analysis of Biologically Motivated Model for Formaldehyde-Induced Respiratory Cancer in Humans
Ann. Hyg., August 1, 2008; 52(6): 481 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
J. D. Schroeter, J. S. Kimbell, M. E. Andersen, and D. C. Dorman
Use of a Pharmacokinetic-Driven Computational Fluid Dynamics Model to Predict Nasal Extraction of Hydrogen Sulfide in Rats and Humans
Toxicol. Sci., December 1, 2006; 94(2): 359 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
J. R. Harkema, S. A. Carey, and J. G. Wagner
The Nose Revisited: A Brief Review of the Comparative Structure, Function, and Toxicologic Pathology of the Nasal Epithelium
Toxicol Pathol, April 1, 2006; 34(3): 252 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
J. S. Kimbell
Nasal Dosimetry of Inhaled Gases and Particles: Where Do Inhaled Agents Go in the Nose?
Toxicol Pathol, April 1, 2006; 34(3): 270 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
R. B. Conolly, J. S. Kimbell, D. Janszen, P. M. Schlosser, D. Kalisak, J. Preston, and F. J. Miller
Human Respiratory Tract Cancer Risks of Inhaled Formaldehyde: Dose-Response Predictions Derived From Biologically-Motivated Computational Modeling of a Combined Rodent and Human Dataset
Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2004; 82(1): 279 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
R. B. Conolly, J. S. Kimbell, D. Janszen, P. M. Schlosser, D. Kalisak, J. Preston, and F. J. Miller
Biologically Motivated Computational Modeling of Formaldehyde Carcinogenicity in the F344 Rat
Toxicol. Sci., October 1, 2003; 75(2): 432 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
J. H. Overton, J. S. Kimbell, and F. J. Miller
Dosimetry Modeling of Inhaled Formaldehyde: The Human Respiratory Tract
Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2001; 64(1): 122 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
C. Timchalk, H. E Trease, L. L Trease, K. R Minard, and R. A Corley
Potential technology for studying dosimetry and response to airborne chemical and biological pollutants
Toxicology and Industrial Health, June 1, 2001; 17(5-10): 270 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.