Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tornero-Velez, R.
Right arrow Articles by Rappaport, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tornero-Velez, R.
Right arrow Articles by Rappaport, S. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences 64, 151-161 (2001)
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Toxicology


BIOTRANSFORMATION AND TOXICOKINETIC

Physiological Modeling of the Relative Contributions of Styrene-7,8-oxide Derived from Direct Inhalation and from Styrene Metabolism to the Systemic Dose in Humans

Rogelio Tornero-Velez and Stephen M. Rappaport,1

Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599–7400

Workers in the reinforced plastics industry are exposed to large quantities of styrene and to small amounts of the carcinogen, styrene-7,8-oxide (SO), in air. Since SO is also the primary metabolite of styrene, we modified a published physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to investigate the relative contributions of inhaled SO and metabolically derived SO to the systemic levels of SO in humans. The model was tested against air and blood measurements of styrene and SO from 252 reinforced plastics workers. Results suggest that the highly efficient first-pass hydrolysis of SO via epoxide hydrolase in the liver greatly reduces the systemic availability of SO formed in situ from styrene. In contrast, airborne SO, absorbed via inhalation, is distributed to the systemic circulation, thereby avoiding such privileged-access metabolism. The best fit to the model was obtained when the relative systemic availability (the ratio of metabolic SO to absorbed SO per unit exposure) equaled 2.75 x 10-4, indicating that absorbed SO contributed 3640 times more SO to the blood than an equivalent amount of inhaled styrene. Since the ratio of airborne styrene to SO rarely exceeds 1500 in the reinforced plastics industry, this indicates that inhalation of SO presents a greater hazard of cytogenetic damage than inhalation of styrene. We conclude that future studies should assess exposures to airborne SO as well as styrene.

Key Words: bioavailability; inhalation; physiologically based modeling; reinforced plastics; styrene; styrene-7,8-oxide.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
E. D. McLanahan, M. E. Andersen, and J. W. Fisher
A Biologically Based Dose-Response Model for Dietary Iodide and the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Thyroid Axis in the Adult Rat: Evaluation of Iodide Deficiency
Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2008; 102(2): 241 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
L. Godderis, P Aka, M Kirsch-Volders, and H Veulemans
Comparison of genotoxic potency of styrene 7,8-oxide with {gamma} radiation and human cancer risk estimation of styrene using the rad-equivalence approach
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2007; 22(3): 209 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
B Serdar, R Tornero-Velez, D Echeverria, L A Nylander-French, L L Kupper, and S M Rappaport
Predictors of occupational exposure to styrene and styrene-7,8-oxide in the reinforced plastics industry
Occup. Environ. Med., October 1, 2006; 63(10): 707 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.