Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buchanan, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Iguchi, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buchanan, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Iguchi, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences 66, 62-68 (2002)
Copyright © 2002 by the Society of Toxicology


ENDOCRINE TOXICOLOGY

Dioxin Inhibition of Estrogen-Induced Mouse Uterine Epithelial Mitogenesis Involves Changes in Cyclin and Transforming Growth Factor-ß Expression

David L. Buchanan*,{dagger},1, Seiichiro Ohsako{dagger},{ddagger}, Chiharu Tohyama{dagger},{ddagger}, Paul S. Cooke§ and Taisen Iguchi*

* Center for Integrative Bioscience, Okazaki National Research Institutes, Okazaki, Aichi 444-8585, Japan; {dagger} CREST, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012, Japan; {ddagger} National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, 305-8506, Japan; and § Department of Veterinary Biosciences and Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61802, Illinois

A single dose of dioxin (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin or TCDD; 5 µg/kg, ip) inhibits 17ß-estradiol (E2)-induced uterine epithelial mitogenesis, apparently through disruption of stromal-epithelial interactions. To understand if TCDD alters early uterine (Ut) responses to E2, young adult C57BL/6J mice were ovariectomized and given (ip) either oil or 5 µg/kg TCDD. After 24 h, TCDD-treated mice received E2, and oil-treated mice were given E2 or oil. Body and Ut weights were collected 6 and 18 h later. Ut were flash-frozen at 6 h. E2 increased Ut weight (p < 0.0001) and Ut/body weight ratio (p < 0.0001), compared to mice given oil alone. Ut cyclin expression was assessed by an RNase protection assay. E2 increased mRNA expression for cyclin A2 and B1 (p < 0.05), in addition to D1, D2, and D3 (p < 0.001), while cyclin C was unchanged from oil controls and cyclins A1 and B2 were undetectable. In contrast, TCDD completely abolished E2-induced cyclin A2, which has been associated with S phase initiation, and reduced B1 and D2 (p < 0.05). Interestingly, TCDD did not alter E2-induced Ut weight increases at 6 h, but inhibited E2-induced Ut weight gain at 18 h. A 10-µg/kg TCDD dose was necessary for attenuation of the early E2-induced Ut weight increases (p < 0.01). Since TGF-ß regulates cyclins, Ut TGF-ß was also assessed in TCDD + E2-treated and control mice. TGF-ß mRNA levels were increased after TCDD compared to E2 alone (p < 0.01), suggesting a possible mechanism for TCDD inhibition of Ut cyclin A2. Thus, TCDD alters specific E2-regulated Ut G1 phase activities and may inhibit E2-induced Ut epithelial mitogenesis by disrupting specific cell signaling mechanisms necessary for S phase initiation in vivo.

Key Words: cytokine; uterus; estrogen; proliferation; antiestrogen; aryl hydrocarbon receptor; ovariectomy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
D. R. Boverhof, L. D. Burgoon, K. J. Williams, and T. R. Zacharewski
Inhibition of Estrogen-Mediated Uterine Gene Expression Responses by Dioxin
Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2008; 73(1): 82 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.