Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abou-Donia, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Khan, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abou-Donia, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Khan, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences 68, 517-519 (2002)
Copyright © 2002 by the Society of Toxicology

Reply

M. B. Abou-Donia1, L. B. Goldstein2 and W. A. Khan3

1 Departments of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology Duke University Medical Center, PO Box 3813 Durham, NC 27710 2 Department of Medicine (Neurology) Duke University Medical Center, PO Box 3813 Durham, NC 27710 3 Departments of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology Duke University Medical Center, PO Box 3813 Durham, NC 27710

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

To the Editor:

We appreciate the time and effort Dr. Schoenig invested in critically analyzing our work (Abou-Donia et al., 2001Go). Although he may reasonably have questions about details of our methodology, many of his points are unfounded.

Major deficiencies in our experiments cited by Dr. Schoenig begin with the number of control animals. We dispute this contention. As required by our Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and the animal use protocol that was approved by the Department of Defense, we strive to use the fewest possible numbers of animals in our experiments that are sufficient to provide statistically valid results. In previous work, we found that control animals have very consistent performances on the sensorimotor tasks used in the current study. There was no justification for further increasing the number of control animals.

Dr. Schoenig incorrectly believed that the solvent (70% ethanol) was used to apply . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?