Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hansch, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hansch, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences 69, 265-278 (2002)
Copyright © 2002 by the Society of Toxicology


SAFETY EVALUATION

The Relative Toxicity of Substituted Phenols Reported in Cigarette Mainstream Smoke

Carr J. Smith*,1, Thomas A. Perfetti*, Michael J. Morton*, Alan Rodgman{dagger},2, Rajni Garg{ddagger}, Cynthia D. Selassie{ddagger} and Corwin Hansch{ddagger}

* R&D, Bowman Gray Technical Center, RJRT Company, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27102–1487; {dagger} Fundamental Research, R&D, RJRT Company, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27102–1487; and {ddagger} Department of Chemistry, Pomona College, Claremont, California

Cigarette mainstream smoke (MS) contains a number of structurally diverse substituted phenols. Recent quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) studies on phenols show that substituted phenols with electron-releasing groups can form potentially toxic phenoxyl-free radicals. In contrast, substituted phenols with electron-withdrawing groups do not form phenoxyl-free radicals but exert their toxicity primarily through lipophilicity. The chemical structures of 253 different substituted phenols reported in MS have been described in sufficient detail to allow identification of the individual compounds. From a laterally validated equation based on published data on the toxic effects of phenols on cultured cells, the relative toxicity, on a molar basis, of the 253 MS phenols has been determined. Based on this scheme, the most toxic phenols in MS include, in descending order of toxicity, 2-(dimethylamino)-phenol, 2-ethyl-6-methyl-1,4-benzenediol, 2-methoxy-1,4-benzenediol, and 4-ethyl-2-methoxy-6-methylphenol. The least toxic phenols include, in ascending order of toxicity, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid and 3-hydroxybenzenepropanoic acid. In the human exposure situation, the toxicity of MS phenols is a complex interaction, with contributions made by the following factors: toxicity per mole; MS concentration; synergistic, additive or antagonistic interactions with other MS components; host susceptibility; metabolism; and individual smoking behavior and inhalation patterns. In the absence of data to the contrary, reduction in the number and concentration of toxic MS smoke components may be considered to be advantageous. Studies of this type can play an important role in identifying MS components for reduction or removal.

Key Words: free radicals; toxic smoke components; lung disease.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
K. Riveles, R. Roza, and P. Talbot
Phenols, Quinolines, Indoles, Benzene, and 2-Cyclopenten-1-ones are Oviductal Toxicants in Cigarette Smoke
Toxicol. Sci., July 1, 2005; 86(1): 141 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
H. J. Roethig, R. D. Kinser, R. W. Lau, R.-A. Walk, and N. Wang
Short-Term Exposure Evaluation of Adult Smokers Switching From Conventional to First-Generation Electrically Heated Cigarettes During Controlled Smoking
J. Clin. Pharmacol., February 1, 2005; 45(2): 133 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.