Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JACKSON, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by PERTEL, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by JACKSON, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by PERTEL, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1986 Oxford University Press

other

Regulatory Implications of Ames' Mutagenicity Assay Using Salmonella typhimurium1

BENJAMIN A. JACKSON2 and RUTH PERTEL

Division of Pathology and Division of Microbiology, Center for Food Safely and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration Washington, D.C 20204

Regulatory Implications of Ames' Mutagenicity Assay Using Salmonella typhimurium. Jackson, B. A., and Pertel, R. (1986). Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 7, 1-16. Interpretive difficulties can be expected when molecular biology and modern genetics are applied to the safety evaluation of chemicals. Experience, in a regulatory setting, with evaluating the results of short term tests, such as Ames' mutagenicity assay using Salmonella typhimurium (Ames' assay), shows that the traditional toxicological paradigm for interpreting and evaluating the results of such tests is less than adequate. The considerable importance of a negative test outcome to the public health as well as to the course of the commercial development of a potentially useful chemical places special demands on both the investigator and the regulatory reviewer for an understanding of Ames' assay. The adequate design, conduct, interpretation, and evaluation of the outcomes of this assay require a knowledge of the chemical properties of the test agent, an understanding of the scientific basis of the test, and an appreciation of the extent to which modifications of the assay can alter the outcome. The investigator and the regulatory reviewer use the same considerations to determine the adequacy of the test design and of the test results. However, a fundamental difference exists between how they interpret results and how they view the outcome. Results from a study comparing activation systems from food animal and laboratory animal sources are used to illustrate the complexity of using safety data from a genetic test. A framework is developed to suggest how to accommodate the points of view of the investigator and the regulatory reviewer in evaluating these data.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.