Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chipman, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, G. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chipman, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, G. O.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences 71, 146-153 (2003)
Copyright © 2003 by the Society of Toxicology

FORUM

Disruption of Gap Junctions in Toxicity and Carcinogenicity

J. Kevin Chipman1, Angela Mally and Gareth O. Edwards

School of Biosciences, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom

Although the specific role of connexin-mediated gap junctional intercellular communication in the control of cell homeostasis, proliferation, and death are still not clear, several lines of evidence support these roles. The disturbance of this communication, through multiple mechanisms, may in the short term be a protective mechanism to limit the spread of toxicity in a tissue following chemical or radiation damage. However, sustained downregulation confers a loss of tumor-suppressive action. Consequently, connexin dysfunction has been associated with both the action of many carcinogens and being a feature of cancer per se. Connexins offer not only a target for cancer chemoprevention but also for exploitation in chemotherapy through the "bystander" effect.

Key Words: connexin; gap junction; carcinogenesis; bystander; intercellular communication.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Toxicol SciHome page
P. Marx-Stoelting, J. Mahr, T. Knorpp, S. Schreiber, M. F. Templin, T. Ott, A. Buchmann, and M. Schwarz
Tumor Promotion in Liver of Mice with a Conditional Cx26 Knockout
Toxicol. Sci., June 1, 2008; 103(2): 260 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
C. M.J. Conklin, J. F. Bechberger, D. MacFabe, N. Guthrie, E. M. Kurowska, and C. C. Naus
Genistein and quercetin increase connexin43 and suppress growth of breast cancer cells
Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2007; 28(1): 93 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
I. Plante, M. Charbonneau, and D. G. Cyr
Activation of the integrin-linked kinase pathway downregulates hepatic connexin32 via nuclear Akt
Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2006; 27(9): 1923 - 1929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
S. Fukushima, A. Kinoshita, R. Puatanachokchai, M. Kushida, H. Wanibuchi, and K. Morimura
Hormesis and dose-response-mediated mechanisms in carcinogenesis: evidence for a threshold in carcinogenicity of non-genotoxic carcinogens
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2005; 26(11): 1835 - 1845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.