Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warner, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ruch, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warner, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ruch, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences 71, 190-197 (2003)
Copyright © 2003 by the Society of Toxicology


CARCINOGENICITY

Inhibition of Mouse Hepatocyte Gap Junctional Intercellular Communication by Phenobarbital Correlates with Strain-Specific Hepatocarcinogenesis

Kristy A. Warner*, Martha J. Fernstrom* and Randall J. Ruch*,1

* Department of Pathology, Medical College of Ohio, 3055 Arlington Ave., Toledo, Ohio 43614

The inhibition of gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) is a common effect of nongenotoxic carcinogens and might be a biomarker for these agents. To further test this relationship, we hypothesized that phenobarbital would inhibit mouse hepatocyte GJIC and this would correlate with strain-specific hepatocarcinogenicity. Phenobarbital is a strong nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogen in B6C3F1 mice, but not in C57BL/6 mice. Hepatocytes were isolated from males of both strains, placed in coculture with rat liver epithelial cells, and treated with phenobarbital for up to 14 days. Male mice were also administered PB by single intraperitoneal injection (0.1 mg/kg), then sacrificed 24 h later, or given phenobarbital in the drinking water (500 ppm) for 14 days before sacrifice. GJIC was assayed in cocultures by fluorescent dye microinjection and in isolated liver tissue by fluorescent dye "cut-loading." Phenobarbital decreased GJIC only in cultured B6C3F1 hepatocytes; this was dose-responsive and temporary, because hepatocyte GJIC returned to control levels within 24 h of phenobarbital exposure. Administration of phenobarbital to mice for 14 days also decreased hepatocyte dye coupling in B6C3F1 liver, but this effect was not seen in C57BL/6 mice or observed after a single administration of the drug. Phenobarbital did not alter connexin32 and connexin26 expression, but increased hepatic Cyp2b1 expression and the liver weight:body weight ratio in both strains. In summary, phenobarbital inhibited mouse hepatocyte GJIC in vivo and in vitro and in correlation with strain-specific hepatocarcinogenicity. These data support the hypothesis that decreased GJIC is a biomarker for nongenotoxic carcinogens and involved in their carcinogenic mechanism.

Key Words: gap junctions; hepatocyte; cytochrome P450; tumor promotion; nongenotoxic carcinogens; phenobarbital; biomarkers.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
J. M. Phillips, L. D. Burgoon, and J. I. Goodman
Phenobarbital Elicits Unique, Early Changes in the Expression of Hepatic Genes that Affect Critical Pathways in Tumor-Prone B6C3F1 Mice
Toxicol. Sci., June 1, 2009; 109(2): 193 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
G. Singh, P. H. Driever, and J. W. Sander
Cancer risk in people with epilepsy: the role of antiepileptic drugs
Brain, January 1, 2005; 128(1): 7 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.