Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lutz, W. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lutz, W. K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences 75, 223 (2003)
Copyright © 2003 by the Society of Toxicology

Letter

Werner K. Lutz, Ph.D.

Department of Toxicology, University of Wuerzburg, 9 Versbacher St., D-97078 Wuerzburg, Germany, Phone: +49 931 201 48402, Fax: +49 931 201 48446, E-mail: lutz@toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

To the Editor:

I agree with Crump and Clewell (2003)Go that Waddell’s representation of the tumor incidence data of the ED01 study is strongly misleading (Waddell, 2003bGo). The logarithmic transformation of the dose axis makes it impossible to include the control group (dose 0) in . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Toxicol PatholHome page
J. K. Haseman
Response to Waddell & Rozman
Toxicol Pathol, October 1, 2003; 31(6): 715 - 716.
[PDF]