Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on July 11, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
75/2/432    most recent
kfg182v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Conolly, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Conolly, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, F. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences 75, 432-447 (2003)
Copyright © 2003 by the Society of Toxicology


RISK ASSESSMENT

Biologically Motivated Computational Modeling of Formaldehyde Carcinogenicity in the F344 Rat

Rory B. Conolly1, Julia S. Kimbell, Derek Janszen2, Paul M. Schlosser, Darin Kalisak, Julian Preston3 and Frederick J. Miller

CIIT Centers for Health Research, 6 Davis Drive, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709

ABSTRACT

Formaldehyde inhalation at 6 ppm and above causes nasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in F344 rats. The human health implications of this effect are of significant interest since human exposure to environmental formaldehyde is widespread, though at lower concentrations than those that cause cancer in rats. In this article, which is part of a larger effort to predict the human cancer risks of inhaled formaldehyde, we describe biologically motivated quantitative modeling of the exposure-tumor response continuum in the rat. An anatomically realistic, three-dimensional fluid dynamics model of the F344 rat nasal airways was used to predict site-specific flux of formaldehyde from inhaled air into tissue, since both SCC and preneoplastic lesions develop in a characteristic site-specific pattern. Flux into tissue was used as a dose metric for two modes of action, direct mutagenicity and cytolethality-regenerative cellular proliferation (CRCP), which in turn were linked to key parameters of a two-stage clonal growth model. The direct mutagenicity mode of action was represented by a low dose linear dose-response model of DNA-protein cross-link (DPX) formation. An empirical J-shaped dose-response model and a threshold model fit to the empirical data were used for CRCP. In the clonal growth model, the probability of mutation per cell generation was a function of the tissue concentration of DPX while the rate of cell division was calculated from the CRCP data. Maximum likelihood methods were used to estimate parameter values. Survivor (a nontumor outcome) and tumor data for controls from the National Toxicology Program database and from two formaldehyde inhalation bioassays were used for likelihood calculations. The J-shaped dose-response for CRCP provided a better description of the SCC data than did the threshold model. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the rodent tumor response is due to the CRCP mode of action, with the directly mutagenic pathway having little, if any, influence. When evaluated in light of modeling and database uncertainties, particularly the specification of the clonal growth model and the dose-response data for CRCP, this work provides suggestive though not definitive evidence for a J-shaped dose-response for formaldehyde-mediated nasal SCC in the F344 rat.

Key Words: formaldehyde; F344 rat; squamous cell carcinoma; dose-response; clonal growth; DNA-protein cross-links; regenerative cellular proliferation; computational modeling; risk assessment.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
R. B. Conolly, F. J. Miller, J. S. Kimbell, and D. Janszen
Formaldehyde Risk Assessment
Ann. Hyg., March 1, 2009; 53(2): 181 - 184.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
K. S. Crump, C. Chen, J. F. Fox, R. Subramaniam, and C. Van Landingham
Reply
Ann. Hyg., March 1, 2009; 53(2): 184 - 189.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
M. E. Andersen, H. J. Clewell III, E. Bermudez, G. A. Willson, and R. S. Thomas
Genomic Signatures and Dose-Dependent Transitions in Nasal Epithelial Responses to Inhaled Formaldehyde in the Rat
Toxicol. Sci., October 1, 2008; 105(2): 368 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
G. P. Daston
Gene Expression, Dose-Response, and Phenotypic Anchoring: Applications for Toxicogenomics in Risk Assessment
Toxicol. Sci., October 1, 2008; 105(2): 233 - 234.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
K. S. Crump, C. Chen, J. F. Fox, C. Van Landingham, and R. Subramaniam
Sensitivity Analysis of Biologically Motivated Model for Formaldehyde-Induced Respiratory Cancer in Humans
Ann. Hyg., August 1, 2008; 52(6): 481 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
R. S. Thomas, B. C. Allen, A. Nong, L. Yang, E. Bermudez, H. J. Clewell III, and M. E. Andersen
A Method to Integrate Benchmark Dose Estimates with Genomic Data to Assess the Functional Effects of Chemical Exposure
Toxicol. Sci., July 1, 2007; 98(1): 240 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
J. R. Harkema, S. A. Carey, and J. G. Wagner
The Nose Revisited: A Brief Review of the Comparative Structure, Function, and Toxicologic Pathology of the Nasal Epithelium
Toxicol Pathol, April 1, 2006; 34(3): 252 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
J. S. Kimbell
Nasal Dosimetry of Inhaled Gases and Particles: Where Do Inhaled Agents Go in the Nose?
Toxicol Pathol, April 1, 2006; 34(3): 270 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
S. D. Hester, W. T. Barry, F. Zou, and D. C. Wolf
Transcriptomic Analysis of F344 Rat Nasal Epithelium Suggests That the Lack of Carcinogenic Response to Glutaraldehyde is Due to its Greater Toxicity Compared to Formaldehyde
Toxicol Pathol, June 1, 2005; 33(4): 415 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
M. E. Meek
Biologically Motivated Computational Modeling: Contribution to Risk Assessment
Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2004; 82(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
R. B. Conolly, J. S. Kimbell, D. Janszen, P. M. Schlosser, D. Kalisak, J. Preston, and F. J. Miller
Human Respiratory Tract Cancer Risks of Inhaled Formaldehyde: Dose-Response Predictions Derived From Biologically-Motivated Computational Modeling of a Combined Rodent and Human Dataset
Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2004; 82(1): 279 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.