Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on February 19, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
79/1/10    most recent
kfh091v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, G. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences 79, 10-17 (2004)
Toxicological Sciences vol. 79 no. 1 © Society of Toxicology; all rights reserved.

Evaluation of a Rat Model versus a Physiologically Based Extraction Test for Assessing Phenanthrene Bioavailability from Soils

Xinzhu Pu*, Linda S. Lee{dagger}, Raymond E. Galinsky{ddagger} and Gary P. Carlson*,1

* School of Health Sciences, {dagger} Departments of Agronomy; and {ddagger} Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907

Received November 18, 2003; accepted January 25, 2004

The soil matrix can impact the bioavailability of soil-bound organic chemicals, and this impact is governed in part by soil properties such as organic carbon (OC) content, clay minerals, and pH. Recently, a physiologically based extraction test (PBET) was developed to predict the bioavailability of soil-bound organic chemicals. In the current study, the bioavailability of phenanthrene (PA) from laboratory-treated soils varying in OC content, clay, and pH was investigated using an in vivo rat model and an in vitro PBET. The relationship between these two approaches was also examined. In the in vivo assay, soils and corn oil containing equivalent levels of PA were administered to Sprague-Dawley rats by gavage at two dose levels: 400 and 800 mg/kg body weight. Equivalent doses were given via intravenous injection (iv). The areas under the blood concentration-versus-time curves (AUC) were measured, and the absolute and relative bioavailabilities of PA were determined for each soil. In the PBET tests, one g of each soil was extracted by artificial saliva, gastric juice, duodenum juice, and bile. The fraction of PA mobilized from each soil was quantified. The AUCs of PA in all soils were significantly lower than those following iv injection (p < 0.05), indicating that the soil matrix could reduce the bioavailability of PA from soil. There were obvious trends of soils with higher OC content and clay content, resulting in the lower bioavailability of PA from soil. A significant correlation (p < 0.05) was observed between the fraction of PA mobilized from soil in the PBET and its in vivo bioavailability. The data also showed that the absolute bioavailability of PA from corn oil was low: approximately 25%. These results suggest that PBET assay might be a useful alternative in predicting bioavailability of soil-bound organic chemicals. However, due to the limited soil types and use of one chemical vs. a variety of contaminants and soil properties in the environment, further efforts involving more chemicals and soil types are needed to validate this surrogate method.

Key Words: phenanthrene; bioavailability; soil; physiologically based extraction test.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.