Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on July 28, 2004
Toxicological Sciences 2004 82(1):154-163; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfh238
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
82/1/154    most recent
kfh238v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heringa, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hermens, J. L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heringa, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hermens, J. L. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences vol. 82 no. 1 © Society of Toxicology 2004; all rights reserved.

Xenoestrogenicity in In Vitro Assays Is Not Caused by Displacement of Endogenous Estradiol from Serum Proteins

Minne B. Heringa*, Bart van der Burg{dagger}, Jan C. H. van Eijkeren{ddagger} and Joop L. M. Hermens*,1

* Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, Yalelaan 2, 3584 CM Utrecht, the Netherlands; {dagger} Biodetection Systems B.V., 1031 CM Amsterdam, the Netherlands; {ddagger} National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3720 BA Bilthoven, the Netherlands

Received April 30, 2004; accepted July 26, 2004

The possibility that compounds tested for estrogenicity can compete for binding places on serum proteins and cause an increase of available and very potent endogenous estrogens is of great interest for both the in vitro assay results and the prediction of risk for humans. In in vitro assays, small amounts of estradiol remaining after the charcoal stripping of serum applied in the culture medium could be displaced by the tested compounds, leading to an estrogenic response that might be falsely attributed to the test compound. We have studied the stripping efficiency of charcoal and measured whether reported xenoestrogens can displace estradiol from serum in an in vitro assay using negligible depletion–solid phase microextraction (nd–SPME). Possible competition was also studied with a mathematical exposure model, from which the predictions were compared to the measurements. We found that the common charcoal stripping procedure removed 99% of initially present estradiol. Additionally, our results with charcoal adsorption indicate that charcoal is not useful for serum protein binding assays, as it adsorbs more than the free fraction of ligand. Although the competition model predicted a displacement of estradiol from the serum proteins at the higher applied doses of xenoestrogen, the measurements showed no displacement. Therefore, we conclude that estrogenic responses in the in vitro assay applied here are not caused by displacement of remaining estradiol in the stripped serum. The possibility remains, however, that our displacement hypothesis does apply for estrogen sulfates, as these are present in much higher concentrations than estradiol in stripped serum.

Key Words: displacement; serum proteins; estrogen; charcoal assay.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
C. Ankarberg-Lindgren and E. Norjavaara
A purification step prior to commercial sensitive immunoassay is necessary to achieve clinical usefulness when quantifying serum 17 -estradiol in prepubertal children
Eur. J. Endocrinol., January 1, 2008; 158(1): 117 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.