Skip Navigation

Toxicological Sciences 2005 83(1):1-3; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfi036
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences vol. 83 no. 1 © Society of Toxicology 2005; all rights reserved.

TOXICOLOGICAL HIGHLIGHT

Compartmentalization of Redox Regulation of Cell Responses

Charles V. Smith1

Center for Developmental Pharmacology and Toxicology, Columbus Children's Research Institute, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, Ohio 43205

1 For correspondence via fax: (614) 722-2774. E-mail: smithcv@chi.osu.edu

Received November 11, 2004; accepted November 11, 2004

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

In the November issue of Toxicological Sciences, Hansen et al. (2004)Go report results that they conclude show that a transcriptional regulator, NE-F2-related factor 2 (Nrf-2), exhibits compartmentally differential redox responses. The working model put forward by Hansen is conceptually straightforward. In the model, Nrf-2 is retained in the cytosol by Keap-1, but when critical thiols on Keap-1 are oxidized, Nrf-2 is released and translocated to the nucleus, where Nrf-2 participates in the transcriptional activation of numerous genes. For Nrf-2 to be fully functional in transcriptional activation, a key cysteine residue must be in the thiol (reduced) form. The model proposed by Hansen et al. overlooks the contributions of phosphorylation in activation of Nrf-2 (Huang et al., 2002Go; Nguyen et al., 2004Go) and . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
R. A. Roberts, D. L. Laskin, C. V. Smith, F. M. Robertson, E. M. G. Allen, J. A. Doorn, and W. Slikker
Nitrative and Oxidative Stress in Toxicology and Disease
Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2009; 112(1): 4 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
V. L. Kolossov, B. Q. Spring, A. Sokolowski, J. E. Conour, R. M. Clegg, P. J. A. Kenis, and H. R. Gaskins
Engineering Redox-Sensitive Linkers for Genetically Encoded FRET-Based Biosensors
Experimental Biology and Medicine, February 1, 2008; 233(2): 238 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]