Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on July 13, 2005
Toxicological Sciences 2005 87(2):442-450; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfi254
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
87/2/442    most recent
kfi254v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amin, K.
Right arrow Articles by Behrsing, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amin, K.
Right arrow Articles by Behrsing, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

In Vitro Detection of Differential and Cell-Specific Hepatobiliary Toxicity Induced by Geldanamycin and 17-Allylaminogeldanamycin Using Dog Liver Slices

Khalid Amin, Carmen Ip, Lucita Jimenez, Charles Tyson and Holger Behrsing1

SRI International, Menlo Park, California 94025

Received April 29, 2005; accepted June 30, 2005

Experiments on rat liver slices demonstrated the differential hepatobiliary toxic potency of two anticancer agents, geldanamycin (GEL) and 17-allylaminogeldanamycin (17-AAG), over a 5-day period. This report describes the pattern of toxicity of these agents in dog liver tissue, using the in vitro liver slice culture model. Liver slices (200 µm thick) from male beagle dogs were cultured for 5 days in chemically defined culture medium containing a range of GEL and 17-AAG concentrations (0.1–5 µM). Tissues were evaluated using a panel of clinically relevant biomarkers and histological endpoints. GEL-induced reduction of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and {gamma}-glutamyl transferase (GGT) slice levels, indicators of biliary epithelial cell (BEC) viability, was supported by histological findings showing an increasing loss of BEC as higher concentrations were applied. At the highest concentrations studied, GEL caused both hepatocellular necrosis and BEC loss. Biomarker pattern results in the medium concurred with those from slice biochemistry measurements and histology. 17-AAG, a less potent compound in vivo, elicited more biomarker retention at higher concentrations than did GEL. Histological analysis revealed higher BEC viability and significant retention of BEC proliferation as compared with GEL. However, at the highest concentration, the toxic insult caused a marked decrease in BEC viability and proliferation. Comparison of responses with both compounds indicated that slices exposed to the same concentrations were more sensitive to GEL than to 17-AAG. Dog liver slices can thus be used to evaluate species-, compound-, and concentration-dependent differences in toxicity.

Key Words: geldanamycin; 17-AAG; dog; liver slices; toxicity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Toxicol PatholHome page
K. Amin, C. Ip, B. Sato, T. Le, C. E. Green, C. A. Tyson, and H. P. Behrsing
Characterization of ANIT-Induced Toxicity using Precision-Cut Rat and Dog Liver Slices Cultured in a Dynamic Organ Roller System
Toxicol Pathol, October 1, 2006; 34(6): 776 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.