Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on August 17, 2005
Toxicological Sciences 2005 88(1):142-149; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfi291
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
88/1/142    most recent
kfi291v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mei, N.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mei, N.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press 2005.

Photomutagenicity of Retinyl Palmitate by Ultraviolet A Irradiation in Mouse Lymphoma Cells

Nan Mei*, Qingsu Xia{dagger}, Ling Chen*,2, Martha M. Moore*, Peter P. Fu{dagger},1 and Tao Chen*,1

* Division of Genetic and Reproductive Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, FDA, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079; {dagger} Division of Biochemical Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, FDA, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079

Received May 24, 2005; accepted June 27, 2005

Retinyl palmitate (RP), a storage form of vitamin A, is frequently used as a cosmetic ingredient, with more than 700 RP-containing cosmetic products on the U.S. market in 2004. There are concerns for the possible genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of RP when it is exposed to sunlight. To evaluate the photomutagenicity of RP in cells when exposed to ultraviolet A (UVA) light, L5178Y/Tk+/– mouse lymphoma cells were treated with different doses of RP alone/or in the presence of UVA light. Treatment of the cells with RP alone at the dose range of 25–100 µg/ml did not increase mutant frequencies (MFs) over the negative control, whereas treatment of cells with 1–25 µg/ml RP under UVA light (82.8 mJ/cm2/min for 30 min) produced a dose-dependent mutation induction. The mean induced MF (392 x 10–6) for treatment with 25 µg/ml RP under UVA exposure was about threefold higher than that for UVA alone (122 x 10–6), a synergistic effect. To elucidate the underlying mechanism of action, we examined the mutants for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at four microsatellite loci spanning the entire chromosome 11, on which the Tk gene is located. The mutational spectrum for the RP + UVA treatment was significantly different from the negative control, but not significantly different from UVA exposure alone. Ninety four percent of the mutants from RP + UVA treatment lost the Tk+ allele, and 91% of the deleted sequences extended more than 6 cM in chromosome length, indicating clastogenic events affecting a large segment of the chromosome. These results suggest that RP is photomutagenic in combination with UVA exposure in mouse lymphoma cells, with a clastogenic mode-of-action.

Key Words: retinyl palmitate; UVA; mouse lymphoma assay; photomutagenicity; loss of heterozygosity; mutant frequency.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
J Yan, Q Xia, W. Wamer, M. Boudreau, A Warbritton, P. Howard, and P. Fu
Levels of retinyl palmitate and retinol in the skin of SKH-1 mice topically treated with retinyl palmitate and concomitant exposure to simulated solar light for thirteen weeks
Toxicology and Industrial Health, November 1, 2007; 23(10): 581 - 589.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.