Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on August 3, 2006
Toxicological Sciences 2006 94(1):92-107; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfl076
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/1/92    most recent
kfl076v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacGregor, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Dertinger, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacGregor, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Dertinger, S. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press 2006.

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Micronuclei in Peripheral Blood Reticulocytes: II. An Efficient Method of Monitoring Chromosomal Damage in the Rat

James T. MacGregor*,1, Michelle E. Bishop{dagger}, James P. McNamee{ddagger}, Makoto Hayashi§, Norhide Asano, Akihiro Wakata||, Madoka Nakajima|||, Junichiro Saito||||, Anane Aidoo{dagger}, Martha M. Moore{dagger} and Stephen D. Dertinger#

* FDA National Center for Toxicological Research, Rockville, Maryland 21012 {dagger} FDA National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079 {ddagger} Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0L2 § National Institute of Health Sciences, Tokyo 158-8501, Japan Nitto Denko Corporation, Osaka 567-8680, Japan || Astellas Pharma, Inc., Osaka 532-8514, Japan ||| An-Pyo Center, Shizuoka 437-1213, Japan |||| Astellas Pharma Inc., Tokyo 174-8511, Japan # Litron Laboratories, Rochester, New York 14623

Received February 2, 2006; accepted July 31, 2006

We have evaluated a flow cytometric method that allows assessment of micronucleated reticulocytes (MN-RETs) in microliter quantities of peripheral blood and compared results using this assay with those of established microscopic methods of scoring bone marrow and peripheral blood from rats treated with well-characterized genotoxic agents. Young reticulocytes (RETs) are labeled with FITC–anti-CD71 (transferrin receptor) and micronuclei with propidium iodide (with RNase treatment). Red blood cells parasitized with Plasmodia serve as a calibration standard for DNA content. Microscopic scoring used acridine orange (AO) staining of methanol-fixed slides or supravital AO staining. The effect of the rat spleen on the parameters evaluated was determined by comparing age- and sex-matched normal and splenectomized rats treated with cyclophosphamide, cis-platin, or vinblastine under treatment conditions that established a steady-state frequency of MN-RETs in the bone marrow and peripheral blood compartments. The data demonstrate the sensitivity and reproducibility of the flow cytometric assay in the Sprague-Dawley rat, and comparative studies using identical blinded samples at multiple laboratories show that inter- and intra-laboratory reproducibility is much higher with the flow method than with the microscopic methods currently employed for regulatory studies. A significant effect of splenic selection against genotoxicant-induced MN-RETs was observed with each of the three scoring methodologies, despite the fact that the flow and supravital AO techniques restrict analysis to the youngest fraction of RETs. The high precision of flow-based measurements also demonstrated a slight but statistically significant level of selection against spontaneously arising MN-RET. Despite these spleen effects, assay sensitivity for blood-based analyses was maintained by the flow method as it was shown to have superior counting statistics, lower variability, and higher sensitivity than manual scoring. The data suggest that flow cytometric assessment of micronucleus induction can be integrated into routine toxicity testing, eliminating the need for a separate bioassay.

Key Words: flow cytometric analysis; micronucleated reticulocytes; erythrocytes; cyclophosphamide, cis-platin; vinblastine.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
C. E. Hotchkiss, M. E. Bishop, S. D. Dertinger, W. Slikker Jr, M. M. Moore, and J. T. MacGregor
Flow Cytometric Analysis of Micronuclei in Peripheral Blood Reticulocytes IV: An Index of Chromosomal Damage in the Rhesus Monkey (Macaca mulatta)
Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2008; 102(2): 352 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
S. B. Harper, S. D. Dertinger, M. E. Bishop, A. M. Lynch, M. Lorenzo, M. Saylor, and J. T. MacGregor
Flow Cytometric Analysis of Micronuclei in Peripheral Blood Reticulocytes III. An Efficient Method of Monitoring Chromosomal Damage in the Beagle Dog
Toxicol. Sci., December 1, 2007; 100(2): 406 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
A. Vikram, P. Ramarao, and G. Jena
Prior bleeding enhances the sensitivity of peripheral blood and bone marrow micronucleus tests in rats
Mutagenesis, July 1, 2007; 22(4): 287 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
Z. Cammerer, A. Elhajouji, M. Kirsch-Volders, and W. Suter
Comparison of the peripheral blood micronucleus test using flow cytometry in rat and mouse exposed to aneugens after single-dose applications
Mutagenesis, March 1, 2007; 22(2): 129 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.