ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on January 18, 2007
Toxicological Sciences 2007 97(2):241-252; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfm005
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Published by Oxford University Press 2007.
Can Exposure Characterization Explain Concurrence or Discordance between Toxicology and Epidemiology?
* Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0K9, Canada
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: 519-837-3816. E-mail: lritter{at}uoguelph.ca.
Received January 4, 2007; accepted January 10, 2007
 |
Abstract |
|---|
The importance of reliable exposure assessment, as a key component of the overall risk assessment process, has been well described for some considerable time. Yet, despite this widely accepted tenet, many studies conclude significant adverse health effects, with associated public policy implications, in the absence of adequate or, in some cases, even rudimentary, exposure quantification. Moreover, it appears that epidemiological studies in humans and toxicological studies in experimental animals may both suffer from inadequate exposure assessment. In this review, we discuss the nature and quality of the exposure assessment in both epidemiologic and toxicologic studies using examples from the pesticides and phthalate literature. Each type of study has its strengths and weaknesses in how exposure is assessed and often the strength of one is also a weakness. It would appear that insufficient or incomplete information about differences in exposure assessment could explain, at least in some cases, the differences in outcome between toxicological and epidemiological studies. Research efforts should focus on improving the feasibility of including biomonitoring in both animal and human studies to facilitate comparisons between animal and human models and improve exposure assessment in epidemiologic studies. Animal and human studies should measure the same biomarkers, where possible, to facilitate human health risk assessment.
Key Words: epidemiology; toxicology; phthalates; pesticides; exposure assessment; risk assessment; biological dose; administered dose.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E MacFarlane, D Glass, and L Fritschi Is farm-related job title an adequate surrogate for pesticide exposure in occupational cancer epidemiology? Occup. Environ. Med., August 1, 2009; 66(8): 497 - 501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Lebailly, V. Bouchart, I. Baldi, Y. Lecluse, N. Heutte, A. Gislard, and J.-P. Malas Exposure to Pesticides in Open-field Farming in France Ann. Hyg., January 1, 2009; 53(1): 69 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|