Skip Navigation



ToxSci Advance Access published online on May 2, 2003
Toxicological Sciences, doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfg102
Toxicological Sciences © Society of Toxicology 2003; all rights reserved
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
74/1/43    most recent
kfg102v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ma, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schlumpf, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ma, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schlumpf, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received November 23, 2003; accepted March 24, 2003
© 2003 Society of Toxicology

Endocrine Toxicology

UV Filters with Antagonistic Action at Androgen Receptors in the MDA-kb2 Cell Transcriptional-Activation Assay

Risheng Ma 1, Bea Cotton 1, Walter Lichtensteiger 1, Margret Schlumpf 1*

1 Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: schlumpm{at}pharma.unizh.ch.


  Abstract

The fact that certain UV filters used in cosmetics display estrogenic activity, prompted us to study potential actions on androgen receptors (AR) in the human breast carcinoma cell line MDA-kb2 which expresses functional endogenous AR and glucocorticoid receptors (GR), and is stably transfected with a luciferase reporter plasmid. Dihydrotestosterone (DHT), methyltrienolone (R1881), methyltestosterone, danazol and androstenedione increased luciferase activity with EC50 values between 0.11nM (R1881), 0.14nM (DHT), and 73.5nM (androstenedione). DHT-induced luciferase gene expression was inhibited by non-steroidal antiandrogens, hydroxyflutamide, flutamide, bicalutamide and vinclozolin. In contrast, the steroidal AR agonist/antagonist cyproterone actetate showed agonistic activity in the absence and presence of DHT, which was not blocked by hydroxyflutamide and thus seems not to be mediated by AR. GR-mediated activation of luciferase by dexamethasone was 100 times less potent than DHT and was not antagonized by hydroxyflutamide. The cell line was used for screening of UV filters, benzophenone-3 (Bp-3), benzophenone-4, 3-benzylidene camphor, 4-methylbenzylidene camphor, butyl-methoxy-dibenzoylmethane, homosalate (HMS), octyl-dimethyl-PABA, and octyl-methoxycinnamate. Two of these, Bp-3 and HMS, antagonized DHT-induced AR activation below cytotoxic concentrations, with IC50 of 5.57 10-6 M (HMS) and 4.98 10-6 M (Bp-3). None of the eight UV filters displayed agonistic activity when tested alone, but high concentrations of Bp-3 induced an increase of luciferase activity in the presence of dexamethasone, which was not blocked by hydroxyflutamide or the estrogen antagonist, ICI 182,780. These data indicate that the UV filters Bp-3 and HMS possess antiandrogenic activity in vitro in addition to estrogenic activity.

Key Words: MDA-kb2 cells, androgen receptor, androgen, antiandrogen, endocrine disruptor, pesticide, UV filter .


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
P. Roy, M. Alevizaki, and I. Huhtaniemi
In vitro bioassays for androgens and their diagnostic applications
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2008; 14(1): 73 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
D. V. Henley, N. Lipson, K. S. Korach, and C. A. Bloch
Prepubertal Gynecomastia Linked to Lavender and Tea Tree Oils
N. Engl. J. Med., February 1, 2007; 356(5): 479 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 EndocrinologyHome page
S. Durrer, K. Maerkel, M. Schlumpf, and W. Lichtensteiger
Estrogen Target Gene Regulation and Coactivator Expression in Rat Uterus after Developmental Exposure to the Ultraviolet Filter 4-Methylbenzylidene Camphor
Endocrinology, May 1, 2005; 146(5): 2130 - 2139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Toxicol SciHome page
R. H. M. M. Schreurs, E. Sonneveld, J. H. J. Jansen, W. Seinen, and B. van der Burg
Interaction of Polycyclic Musks and UV Filters with the Estrogen Receptor (ER), Androgen Receptor (AR), and Progesterone Receptor (PR) in Reporter Gene Bioassays
Toxicol. Sci., February 1, 2005; 83(2): 264 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.