Skip Navigation



ToxSci Advance Access published online on July 25, 2003

Toxicological Sciences, doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfg188
Toxicological Sciences © Society of Toxicology 2003; all rights reserved
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
75/2/355    most recent
kfg188v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pessina, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gribaldo, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pessina, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gribaldo, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received June 3, 2003; accepted June 25, 2003
© 2003 Society of Toxicology

In Vitro Toxicology and Alternative Testing

Application of the GM-CFU Assay to Predict Acute Drug-Induced Neutropenia: An International Blind Trial to Validate a Prediction Model for the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Myelosuppressive Xenobiotics

A. Pessina 1*, B. Albella 2, M. Bayo 1, J. Bueren 2, P. Brantom 3, S. Casati 4, C. Croera 1, G. Gagliardi 1, P. Foti 1, R. Parchment 5, D. Parent-Massin 6, G. Schoeters 7, Y. Sibiril 6, R. Van Den Heuvel 7, and L. Gribaldo 4

1 Institute of Microbiology, Milan, Italy
2 CIEMAT, Madrid, Spain
3 BIBRA International, Carshalton, UK
4 ECVAM, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy
5 Wayne State University, Detroit, USA
6 ESMISAB, Plouzanè, France
7 VITO, Mol, Belgium

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: augusto.pessina{at}unimi.it.


   Abstract

In a previous study of prevalidation, a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for two independent in vitro tests (human and mouse) has been developed, to evaluate the potential hematotoxicity of xenobiotics from their direct, adverse effects on CFU-GM. A predictive model to calculate the human Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) was set up, by adjusting mouse-derived MTD for the differential inter-species sensitivity. In this report, we describe an international blind trial designed to apply this model to the clinical neutropenia, by testing 20 drugs including 14 antineoplastics (Cytosar-U, 5-Fluorouracil, Myleran, Thioguanine, Fludarabine, Bleomycin, Methotrexate, Gemcitabine, Carmustine, Etoposide, Teniposide, Cytoxan, Taxol, Adriamycin); 2 antivirals (Retrovir, Zovirax,); 3 drugs for other therapeutic indications (Cyclosporin, Thorazine, Indocin) and 1 pesticide (Lindane).

The results confirmed that the SOP developed generates reproducible IC90 values both with human and murine GM-CFU. For 10 drugs (Adriamycin, Bleomycin, Etoposide, Fludarabine, 5-Fluorouracil, Myleran, Taxol, Teniposide, Thioguanine and Thorazine) IC90 values were found within the range of the actual drug doses tested (defined as actual IC90). For other 10 drugs (Carmustine, Cyclosporin, Cytosar-U, Cytoxan, Gemcitabine, Indocin, Lindane, Methotrexate, Retrovir and Zovirax) extrapolation on the regression curve out of the range of the actual doses tested was required to derive IC90 values (extrapolated IC90).

The model correctly predicted the human MTD for 10 drugs out of 10 that had "actual IC90 values" and 7 drugs out of 10 for those having only an extrapolated IC90. Two of the incorrect predictions (Gemcitabine and Zovirax) were within 6-fold of the correct MTD, instead of the 4-fold range required by the model whereas prediction with Cytosar-U was ~10-fold in error. A possible explanation of the failure in the prediction of these 3 drugs, which are pyrimidine analogs, is discussed.

We concluded that our model correctly predicted the human MTD for 20 drugs out of 23, since other three drugs (Topotecan, PZA and Flavopiridol) were tested in the prevalidation study. The high percentage of predicitivity (87%), as well as the reproducibility of the SOP testing, confirm that the model can be considered scientifically validated in this study, suggesting promising applications to other areas of research in developing validated hematotoxicological in vitro methods.

Key Words: GM-CFU assay, acute neutropenia, maximum tolerated dose, phase I trial, myelotoxicity .


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
B. A. Teicher
In Vivo/Ex Vivo and In Situ Assays Used in Cancer Research: A Brief Review
Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2009; 37(1): 114 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
L. S. Kurtzberg, T. Battle, C. Rouleau, R. G. Bagley, N. Agata, M. Yao, S. Schmid, S. Roth, J. Crawford, R. Krumbholz, et al.
Bone marrow and tumor cell colony-forming units and human tumor xenograft efficacy of noncamptothecin and camptothecin topoisomerase I inhibitors
Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2008; 7(10): 3212 - 3222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
S. Miknyoczki, H. Chang, J. Grobelny, S. Pritchard, C. Worrell, N. McGann, M. Ator, J. Husten, J. Deibold, R. Hudkins, et al.
The selective poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1(2) inhibitor, CEP-8983, increases the sensitivity of chemoresistant tumor cells to temozolomide and irinotecan but does not potentiate myelotoxicity
Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2007; 6(8): 2290 - 2302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
I. N. Rich and K. M. Hall
Validation and Development of a Predictive Paradigm for Hemotoxicology Using a Multifunctional Bioluminescence Colony-Forming Proliferation Assay
Toxicol. Sci., October 1, 2005; 87(2): 427 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.