Skip Navigation



ToxSci Advance Access published online on August 13, 2004

Toxicological Sciences, doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfh249
Toxicological Sciences © Society of Toxicology 2004; all rights reserved
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
82/1/237    most recent
kfh249v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carney, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Holsapple, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carney, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Holsapple, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received April 15, 2004
Accepted June 24, 2004

Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology

The Effects of Feed Restriction During in Utero and Postnatal Development in Rats

E. W. Carney 1*, C. L. Zablotny 1, M. S. Marty 1, J. W. Crissman 1, P. Anderson 1, M. Woolhiser 1, M. Holsapple 1

1 Toxicology & Environmental Research and Consulting, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ecarney{at}dow.com.


   Abstract

This study determined the effects of feed restriction (FR) during in utero and postnatal life on standard reproductive toxicity and developmental immunotoxicity end points. Groups of 26 time-mated CD rats were fed various amounts of Purina 5002 diet from gestation day 7 through lactation. Control rats were fed once per day in amounts based on historical control feed consumption data, while the amounts fed to the FR groups were reduced by 10% (10% FR), 30% (30% FR) or 50% (50% FR) relative to controls. Selected F1 weanlings were necropsied on postnatal day (PND) 22, assessed for immunotoxicity end points between PND 22-27 or PND 52-56, or maintained on FR through PND 70. Thereafter, half the remaining F1 rats in each group were fed ad lib (recovery subgroup), while the rest continued on FR. Both subgroups were necropsied at 21 weeks of age. In the 10% FR group, slight decreases in maternal body weight had no effect on F1 offspring body weights, but did decrease F1 liver weights. FR at the 30% level reduced maternal body weights by 10-20%, reduced F1 offspring body weights by as much as 21%, caused changes in numerous weanling organ weights, but did not affect reproductive or immune system function. Dams in the 50% FR group were 17-32% lighter than controls, resulting in F1 body weights that were 12-47% lower than controls. F1 estrous cycle length was increased, puberty was delayed by 6 days (males and females), and anogenital distance, epididymal sperm counts, and all organ weights were decreased in this group. Antibody responses were unaffected despite decreased spleen and thymus weights. Essentially all effects of feed restriction showed evidence of reversibility.

Keywords: reproductive toxicity; developmental toxicity; maternal toxicity; developmental immunotoxicity.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Lab AnimHome page
I H E Kasanen, K J Inhila, O M Vainio, V V Kiviniemi, J Hau, M Scheinin, S M Mering, and T O Nevalainen
The diet board: welfare impacts of a novel method of dietary restriction in laboratory rats
Lab Anim, July 1, 2009; 43(3): 215 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Lab AnimHome page
I H E Kasanen, K J Inhila, J I Nevalainen, S B Vaisanen, A M O Mertanen, S M Mering, and T O Nevalainen
A novel dietary restriction method for group-housed rats: weight gain and clinical chemistry characterization
Lab Anim, April 1, 2009; 43(2): 138 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of ToxicologyHome page
L. A. Burns-Naas, K. L. Hastings, G. S. Ladics, S. L. Makris, G. A. Parker, and M. P. Holsapple
What's So Special about the Developing Immune System?
International Journal of Toxicology, March 1, 2008; 27(2): 223 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
D. R. Bell, S. Clode, M. Q. Fan, A. Fernandes, P. M. D. Foster, T. Jiang, G. Loizou, A. MacNicoll, B. G. Miller, M. Rose, et al.
Toxicity of 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the Developing Male Wistar(Han) Rat. I: No Decrease in Epididymal Sperm Count after a Single Acute Dose
Toxicol. Sci., September 1, 2007; 99(1): 214 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
A. K. Goetz, H. Ren, J. E. Schmid, C. R. Blystone, I. Thillainadarajah, D. S. Best, H. P. Nichols, L. F. Strader, D. C. Wolf, M. G. Narotsky, et al.
Disruption of Testosterone Homeostasis as a Mode of Action for the Reproductive Toxicity of Triazole Fungicides in the Male Rat
Toxicol. Sci., January 1, 2007; 95(1): 227 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
G. S. Ladics, R. E. Chapin, K. L. Hastings, M. P. Holsapple, S. L. Makris, L. P. Sheets, M. R. Woolhiser, and L. A. Burns-Naas
Developmental Toxicology Evaluations--Issues with Including Neurotoxicology and Immunotoxicology Assessments in Reproductive Toxicology Studies
Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2005; 88(1): 24 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
K. P. Keenan, C.-M. Hoe, L. Mixson, C. L. Mccoy, J. B. Coleman, B. A. Mattson, G. A. Ballam, L. A. Gumprecht, and K. A. Soper
Diabesity: A Polygenic Model of Dietary-Induced Obesity from Ad Libitum Overfeeding of Sprague-Dawley Rats and Its Modulation by Moderate and Marked Dietary Restriction
Toxicol Pathol, October 1, 2005; 33(6): 650 - 674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.