Skip Navigation



ToxSci Advance Access published online on September 8, 2005

Toxicological Sciences, doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfi303
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
88/2/576    most recent
kfi303v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Asmellash, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ichimura, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Asmellash, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ichimura, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org
Received July 15, 2005
Accepted August 24, 2005

Systems Toxicology

Modulating the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response with trans-4,5-Dihydroxy-1,2-dithiane Prevents Chemically-Induced Renal Injury in vivo

Senait Asmellash 1, James L Stevens 2, and Takaharu Ichimura 3*

1 Department of Chemistry, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY; Present Address: Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35294
2 Toxicology and Drug Disposition, Lilly Research Laboratories, A Division of Eli Lilly and Company, Greenfield, IN 46146
3 Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Takaharu Ichimura, E-mail: tichimura{at}partners.org


   Abstract

Agents that disrupt functions of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) induce expression of ER stress-response genes including ER chaperones. Increased expression of the major ER chaperone, Grp78, protects cells, including renal epithelial cells, from chemically-induced injury and death in vitro. In this study, we determined if pharmacological manipulation of the ER stress-response gene is an effective strategy to protect the kidney from chemical stress in vivo. Treatment with trans-4,5-Dihydroxy-1,2-dithiane (DTTox), a novel inducer of ER stress proteins, stimulated a time-and dose-dependent increase in Grp78 expression in the kidney, but did not cause detectable injury. Furthermore, prior treatment with DTTox protected the proximal tubular epithelium against a subsequent challenge with the nephrotoxicant S-(1,1,2,2,-tetrafluoroethyl)-L-cysteine (TFEC). In contrast, activating a heat shock response did not have a protective effect. Prior treatment with DTTox did not reduce covalent binding of radiolabeled reactive metabolites of [35S]TFEC to renal proteins; indicating that protection was not due to an effect on the metabolic activation of TFEC to the reactive metabolite(s) responsible for renal injury. Antisense grp78 expression in the renal epithelial cell line, LLC-PK1, blocked the DTTox-induced Grp78 increase and ablated the protective effect against TFEC damage indicating the induction of grp78 expression and the ER stress response were critical for the protective effect of DTTox. These findings suggest that increased expression of Grp78 plays a major role in the protection of renal epithelial cells from reactive intermediate-induced chemical injury in vivo and that pharmacological manipulation is an effective strategy to prevent damage by some classes of nephrotoxicants.

Keywords: ER stress; Grp78; renal injury; nephrotoxicant; S-(1,1,2,2,-tetrafluoroethyl)-L-cysteine (TFEC); trans-4,5-Dihydroxy-1,2-dithiane (DTTox).
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
M. Kitamura
Endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response in renal pathophysiology: Janus faces
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, August 1, 2008; 295(2): F323 - F334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
R. Inagi, T. Kumagai, H. Nishi, T. Kawakami, T. Miyata, T. Fujita, and M. Nangaku
Preconditioning with Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Ameliorates Mesangioproliferative Glomerulonephritis
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2008; 19(5): 915 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
M. Peyrou, P. E. Hanna, and A. E. Cribb
Calpain Inhibition but not Reticulum Endoplasmic Stress Preconditioning Protects Rat Kidneys from p-Aminophenol Toxicity
Toxicol. Sci., September 1, 2007; 99(1): 338 - 345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
M. Peyrou, P. E. Hanna, and A. E. Cribb
Cisplatin, Gentamicin, and p-Aminophenol Induce Markers of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in the Rat Kidneys
Toxicol. Sci., September 1, 2007; 99(1): 346 - 353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
S. Muruganandan and A. E. Cribb
Calpain-Induced Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Cell Death following Cytotoxic Damage to Renal Cells
Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2006; 94(1): 118 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.