Skip Navigation



ToxSci Advance Access published online on January 10, 2006

Toxicological Sciences, doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfj082
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/2/349    most recent
kfj082v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kunz, P. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Fent, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kunz, P. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Fent, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received July 28, 2005
Accepted December 8, 2005

Environmental Toxicology

Comparison of In Vitro and In Vivo Estrogenic Activity of UV Filters in Fish

Petra Y. Kunz 1, Hector F. Galicia 2, and Karl Fent 3 *

1 University of Applied Sciences Basel, Institute of Environmental Technology, St. Jakobs-Strasse 84, CH-4132 Muttenz, Switzerland; University of Zürich, Institute of Plant Biology, Limnology, Seestrasse 987, CH-8802 Kilchberg, Switzerland
2 Springborn Smithers Laboratories (Europe) AG, Seestrasse 21, CH-9326 Horn, Switzerland
3 University of Applied Sciences Basel, Institute of Environmental Technology, St. Jakobs-Strasse 84, CH-4132 Muttenz, Switzerland; Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Department of Environmental Sciences, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Karl Fent, E-mail: k.fent{at}bluewin.ch


   Abstract

In this work, we evaluate whether in vitro systems are good predictors for in vivo estrogenic activity in fish. We focus on UV filters being largely used in sunscreens and in UV stabilization of materials. First, we determined the estrogenic activity of 23 UV filters and one UV filter metabolite employing a recombinant yeast carrying the estrogen receptor of rainbow trout (rtER{alpha}) and made comparisons with yeast carrying the human hER{alpha} for receptor specificity. Benzophenone-1 (BP1), benzophenone-2 (BP2), 4,4-dihydroxybenzophenone, 4-hydroxybenzophenone, 2,4,4-trihydroxy-benzophenone and phenylsalicylate showed full dose-response curves with maximal responses of 81-115%, whereas 3-benzylidene camphor (3BC), ocylsalicylate, benzylsalicylate, benzophenone-3 and benzophenone-4 displayed lower maximal responses of 15-74 %. Whereas the activity of 17{beta}-estradiol was lower in the rtER{alpha} than the hER{alpha}, the activities of UV filters were similar or relatively higher in rtER{alpha}, indicating different relative binding activities of both ER. Subsequently, we analysed whether the in vitro estrogenicity of 8 UV filters is also displayed in vivo in fathead minnows by the induction potential of vitellogenin after 14 days of aqueous exposure. Of the three active compounds in vivo, 3BC induced vitellogenin at lower concentrations (435 µg/L) than BP1 (4919 µg/L) and BP2 (8783 µg/L). The study shows for the first time estrogenic activities of UV filters in fish both in vitro and in vivo. Thus we propose that receptor-based assays should be used for in vitro screening prior to in vivo testing, leading to environmental risk assessments based on combined, complementing and appropriate species-related assays for hormonal activity.

Keywords: UV filters; Pimephales promelas; Vitellogenin; In vitro-in vivo comparison; fish estrogen receptor {alpha}; human estrogen receptor {alpha}.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
P. Y. Kunz, T. Gries, and K. Fent
The Ultraviolet Filter 3-Benzylidene Camphor Adversely Affects Reproduction in Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas)
Toxicol. Sci., October 1, 2006; 93(2): 311 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.