Skip Navigation



ToxSci Advance Access published online on August 29, 2006
Toxicological Sciences, doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfl092
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/1/46    most recent
kfl092v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laws, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Charles Eldridge, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laws, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Charles Eldridge, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press 2006.
Received May 30, 2006
Accepted August 22, 2006

Endocrine Toxicology

Nature of the Binding Interaction for Fifty Structurally Diverse Chemicals with Rat Estrogen Receptors

Susan C. Laws 1 *, S. Yavanhxay 2, Ralph L. Cooper 1, and J. Charles Eldridge 2

1 Endocrinology Branch, Reproductive Toxicology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, ORD, US EPA, RTP, NC
2 Physiology-Pharmacology Department, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Susan C. Laws, E-mail: Laws.susan{at}epa.gov


  Abstract

This study was conducted to characterize the estrogen receptor (ER) binding affinities of fifty chemicals selected from among the high production volume chemicals under the U.S. EPA's Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) inventory. The chemicals were evaluated using the rat uterine cytosolic (RUC) ER competitive binding assay, with secondary analysis using Lineweaver-Burk plots and slope replots to confirm true competitive inhibition and to determine an experimental Ki. Data from these ER competitive binding assays represent the types of competitive binding curves that can be obtained when screening chemicals with broad structural diversity. True competitive inhibition was observed in 18 of 50 chemicals. Binding affinities were much lower than that of estradiol with Ki concentrations ranging from 0.5 - 373 µM as compared with that of estradiol (0.77 nM). Other chemicals that appeared to displace radiolabeled E2 binding to ER were, in fact, found not to be competitive inhibitors in the secondary Ki experiments. These 7 chemicals likely altered the stability of the assay by changing the buffer pH, denaturing ER, or disrupting the ER binding kinetics. Thus, several conditions that may confound interpretation of RUC ER binding assay data are illustrated. For another group of 8 chemicals, neither an IC50 nor Ki could be determined due to solubility constraints. These chemicals exhibited slight (20-40%) inhibition at concentrations of 10 -100 µM, suggesting that they could be competitors at very high concentrations, yet Ki experiments were not possible as the limit of chemical solubility in the aqueous assay buffer was well above the IC50. An additional 17 of the 50 chemicals were classified as non-binders because in concentrations up to 100 µM they produced essentially no displacement of radiolabeled E2. These results show that although the ER competitive binding assay is a valuable tool for screening chemicals, secondary tests such as a double-reciprocal Lineweaver-Burk experiment with slope replot should be used to confirm true competitive inhibition. This information will be useful for the ongoing validation of the RUC ER competitive binding assay under the U.S. EPA's Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program, as well as to support research efforts to develop computational models designed to identify chemicals with the ability to bind to ER.

Keywords: Estrogen receptors; rat uterine cytosol; environmental chemicals; Ki.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.