Skip Navigation



ToxSci Advance Access published online on August 3, 2007
Toxicological Sciences, doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfm177
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/1/7    most recent
kfm177v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Szyf, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Szyf, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The Dynamic epigenome and its implications in toxicology

Moshe Szyf*,1

1 Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, 3655 Sir William Osler Promenade, Montréal, Québec H3G 1Y6, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed at moshe.szyf{at}mcgill.ca

Received May 6, 2007; revision received June 7, 2007; accepted July 6, 2007


  Abstract

The epigenome serves as an interface between the dynamic environment and the inherited static genome. The epigenome is comprised of chromatin and a covalent modification of DNA by methylation. The epigenome is sculpted during development to shape the diversity of gene expression programs in the different cell types of the organism by a highly organized process. Epigenetic aberrations have similar consequences to genetic polymorphisms resulting in variations in gene function. Recent data suggests that the epigenome is dynamic and is therefore responsive to environmental signals not only during the critical periods in development but also later in life as well. It is postulated here that not only chemicals but also exposure to social behavior, such as maternal care, could affect the epigenome. It is proposed that exposures to different environmental agents could lead to inter-individual phenotypic diversity as well as differential susceptibility to disease and behavioral pathologies. Inter-individual differences in the epigenetic state could also affect susceptibility to xenobiotics. Although our current understanding of how epigenetic mechanisms impact on the toxic action of xenobiotics is very limited, it is anticipated that in the future, epigenetics will be incorporated in the assessment of the safety of chemicals.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
D. J. Waxman and M. G. Holloway
Sex Differences in the Expression of Hepatic Drug Metabolizing Enzymes
Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2009; 76(2): 215 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 International Journal of ToxicologyHome page
D. Desaulniers, G.-h. Xiao, H. Lian, Y.-L. Feng, J. Zhu, J. Nakai, and W. J. Bowers
Effects of Mixtures of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, Methylmercury, and Organochlorine Pesticides on Hepatic DNA Methylation in Prepubertal Female Sprague-Dawley Rats
International Journal of Toxicology, July 1, 2009; 28(4): 294 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Nutr.Home page
G. C. Burdge, K. A. Lillycrop, E. S. Phillips, J. L. Slater-Jefferies, A. A. Jackson, and M. A. Hanson
Folic Acid Supplementation during the Juvenile-Pubertal Period in Rats Modifies the Phenotype and Epigenotype Induced by Prenatal Nutrition
J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1054 - 1060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
S.R Sturzenbaum, J Andre, P Kille, and A.J Morgan
Earthworm genomes, genes and proteins: the (re)discovery of Darwin's worms
Proc R Soc B, March 7, 2009; 276(1658): 789 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
J. Holder
Analysis of chloroethane toxicity and carcinogenicity including a comparison with bromoethane
Toxicology and Industrial Health, November 1, 2008; 24(10): 655 - 675.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.