Skip Navigation



ToxSci Advance Access published online on December 7, 2007

Toxicological Sciences, doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfm294
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/1/187    most recent
kfm294v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilkes, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kodell, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilkes, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kodell, R. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press 2007.

Modeling and assaying dioxin-like biological effects for both dioxin-like and certain non-dioxin-like compounds

Jon G. Wilkes*,{dagger}, Bruce S. Hass{ddagger}, Dan A. Buzatu{dagger}, Lisa M. Pence§, Jeffrey C. Archer§, Richard D. Beger{dagger}, Laura K. Schnackenberg{dagger}, Mary Kim Halbert§, Lisa Jennings§ and Ralph L. Kodell

{dagger} Division of Systems Toxicology, NCTR, 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR 72079 USA E-mail address format: firstname.lastname{at}fda.hhs.gov {ddagger} Division of Genetic and Reproductive Toxicology, NCTR, 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR 72079 USA E-mail address format: firstname.lastname{at}fda.hhs.gov § Dioxin Group, Arkansas Regional Laboratory, 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR 72079 USA E-mail address format: firstname.lastname{at}fda.hhs.gov Division of Biometry and Risk Assessment, NCTR, 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR 72079 USA E-mail address format: firstname.lastname{at}fda.hhs.gov

* Corresponding author contact information: Jon G. Wilkes, Ph.D. Building 26, HFT-233, National Center for Toxicological Research, 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR 72079, Tel: +1 (870) 543-7108, Fax: +1 (870) 543-7686, E-mail: jon.wilkes{at}fda.hhs.gov

Received August 16, 2007; revision received November 9, 2007; accepted December 5, 2007


   Abstract

Previous work demonstrated that 13C NMR data could be correlated to Toxic Equivalency Factors (TEFs) of the 29 polychlorinated dioxin-like compounds (PCDDs, PCDFs, or PCBs) for which non-zero TEFs have been defined. Such correlations are called quantitative spectrometric data-activity relationship (QSDAR) models. An improved QSDAR model predicted TEFs of 0.037 and 0.004, respectively, for 1,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and 1,2,3,4,7-pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (PeCDD), both of which are among the 390 congeners for which zero value TEFs are assumed. A QSDAR model of Relative Potency (REP) values estimated the corresponding values as 0.115 and 0.020. Results from both models indicated that these two congeners are likely to exhibit significant dioxin-like toxicity. If other such congeners also have non-zero toxicity, TEF-based risk assessments of some dioxin-, furan-, or PCB-contaminated sites or foods may be underestimating toxicity. Both models were extensively cross-validated and the TEF model was externally validated. Validation suggested the advisability of confirming the predictions by an independent, preferably in vitro method. We used a luciferase gene expression assay based on mouse liver cells to determine experimental REPs of 0.027 and 0.013, respectively, for 1,3,7,8-TCDD and 1,2,3,4,7-PeCDD. The corresponding QSDAR-estimated and gene-expression assayed values were in close agreement. We then used the models to estimate biological activity for an applicability domain including 108 non-2,3,7,8 dioxin, furan, or PCB congeners and also 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorophenothiazine, a dioxin analog being proposed as a drug candidate. This study showed that QSDAR prediction followed by a relatively inexpensive in vitro assay could be used to nominate a few candidates among hundreds for expensive in vivo evaluation. Success here suggested that in silico and in vitro nomination protocols may enable practical risk assessment when members of a large chemical family exhibit different degrees of toxicity operating through a common biological mechanism.

Key Words: Risk Assessment - regulatory/policy; Agents - dioxin; Agents - polychlorinated biphenyls; Environmental Toxicology; In Vitro and Alternatives - QSAR; Risk Assessment - biological modeling.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.